C. Denton, Celia J. F. Lin, J. Goldin, G. Kim, M. Kuwana, Y. Allanore, A. Batalov, I. Butrimienė, P. Carreira, M. Matucci-Cerinic, O. Distler, D. Kaliterna, C. Mihai, M. Mogensen, M. Olesińska, J. Pope, G. Riemekasten, T. S. Rodriguez-Reyne, M. Santos, J. Laar, H. Spotswood, J. Siegel, A. Jahreis, D. Furst, D. Khanna
{"title":"Lung function preservation in a phase 3 trial of tocilizumab (TCZ) in systemic sclerosis (SSc)","authors":"C. Denton, Celia J. F. Lin, J. Goldin, G. Kim, M. Kuwana, Y. Allanore, A. Batalov, I. Butrimienė, P. Carreira, M. Matucci-Cerinic, O. Distler, D. Kaliterna, C. Mihai, M. Mogensen, M. Olesińska, J. Pope, G. Riemekasten, T. S. Rodriguez-Reyne, M. Santos, J. Laar, H. Spotswood, J. Siegel, A. Jahreis, D. Furst, D. Khanna","doi":"10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.rct1883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Anti–interleukin-6 receptor antibody TCZ showed clinically relevant lung function preservation (forced vital capacity [FVC]) in SSc patients (pts) in a phase 2 trial. Objective: Investigate TCZ vs placebo (PBO) in SSc in a phase 3 trial. Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1 to double-blind subcutaneous TCZ 162 mg or PBO per week (wk) for 48 wks. Primary endpoint: difference (TCZ vs PBO) in modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) change from baseline (∆BL). Secondary endpoints: percent-predicted (pp)FVC; time to treatment failure (TTF; time from first study treatment to first occurrence of death, FVC decline >10%, mRSS increase ≥20% and mRSS ≥5, or occurrence of SSc complications); Health Assessment Questionnaire–Disability Index (HAQ-DI); pt/physician global assessment (Pt/PhGA) visual analog scale. Results: Of 106 PBO and 104 TCZ pts, 31% had previous/current interstitial lung disease based on their history. At wk 48, adjusted least-squares mean difference ∆BL mRSS PBO vs TCZ was –1.7 [95% CI: –3.8, 0.3], p=0.098). Cumulative distribution of ∆BL ppFVC (median [IQR] PBO –3.9 [–7.2, 0.6]; TCZ –0.6 [–5.3, 3.9] van Elteren nominal p=0.0015) and difference in mean ∆BL FVC at wk 48 (167 mL [95% CI: 83, 250]) favored TCZ. TTF hazard ratio (95% CI) was 0.6 (0.4, 1.1) numerically favoring TCZ (Cox proportional hazards p=0.082). No clinically meaningful difference was seen in mean (95% CI) difference ∆BL HAQ-DI –0.1 (–0.2, 0.1), PtGA –2.4 (–8.6, 3.7), PhGA –2.5 (–8.7, 3.8). Safety profile was consistent with SSc complications and TCZ treatment. Conclusion: The primary mRSS endpoint was not met. A clinically relevant difference in FVC was seen for TCZ vs PBO, with preservation of lung function.","PeriodicalId":178396,"journal":{"name":"ILD/DPLD of known origin","volume":"22 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ILD/DPLD of known origin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.rct1883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
Background: Anti–interleukin-6 receptor antibody TCZ showed clinically relevant lung function preservation (forced vital capacity [FVC]) in SSc patients (pts) in a phase 2 trial. Objective: Investigate TCZ vs placebo (PBO) in SSc in a phase 3 trial. Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1 to double-blind subcutaneous TCZ 162 mg or PBO per week (wk) for 48 wks. Primary endpoint: difference (TCZ vs PBO) in modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) change from baseline (∆BL). Secondary endpoints: percent-predicted (pp)FVC; time to treatment failure (TTF; time from first study treatment to first occurrence of death, FVC decline >10%, mRSS increase ≥20% and mRSS ≥5, or occurrence of SSc complications); Health Assessment Questionnaire–Disability Index (HAQ-DI); pt/physician global assessment (Pt/PhGA) visual analog scale. Results: Of 106 PBO and 104 TCZ pts, 31% had previous/current interstitial lung disease based on their history. At wk 48, adjusted least-squares mean difference ∆BL mRSS PBO vs TCZ was –1.7 [95% CI: –3.8, 0.3], p=0.098). Cumulative distribution of ∆BL ppFVC (median [IQR] PBO –3.9 [–7.2, 0.6]; TCZ –0.6 [–5.3, 3.9] van Elteren nominal p=0.0015) and difference in mean ∆BL FVC at wk 48 (167 mL [95% CI: 83, 250]) favored TCZ. TTF hazard ratio (95% CI) was 0.6 (0.4, 1.1) numerically favoring TCZ (Cox proportional hazards p=0.082). No clinically meaningful difference was seen in mean (95% CI) difference ∆BL HAQ-DI –0.1 (–0.2, 0.1), PtGA –2.4 (–8.6, 3.7), PhGA –2.5 (–8.7, 3.8). Safety profile was consistent with SSc complications and TCZ treatment. Conclusion: The primary mRSS endpoint was not met. A clinically relevant difference in FVC was seen for TCZ vs PBO, with preservation of lung function.