Lung function preservation in a phase 3 trial of tocilizumab (TCZ) in systemic sclerosis (SSc)

C. Denton, Celia J. F. Lin, J. Goldin, G. Kim, M. Kuwana, Y. Allanore, A. Batalov, I. Butrimienė, P. Carreira, M. Matucci-Cerinic, O. Distler, D. Kaliterna, C. Mihai, M. Mogensen, M. Olesińska, J. Pope, G. Riemekasten, T. S. Rodriguez-Reyne, M. Santos, J. Laar, H. Spotswood, J. Siegel, A. Jahreis, D. Furst, D. Khanna
{"title":"Lung function preservation in a phase 3 trial of tocilizumab (TCZ) in systemic sclerosis (SSc)","authors":"C. Denton, Celia J. F. Lin, J. Goldin, G. Kim, M. Kuwana, Y. Allanore, A. Batalov, I. Butrimienė, P. Carreira, M. Matucci-Cerinic, O. Distler, D. Kaliterna, C. Mihai, M. Mogensen, M. Olesińska, J. Pope, G. Riemekasten, T. S. Rodriguez-Reyne, M. Santos, J. Laar, H. Spotswood, J. Siegel, A. Jahreis, D. Furst, D. Khanna","doi":"10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.rct1883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Anti–interleukin-6 receptor antibody TCZ showed clinically relevant lung function preservation (forced vital capacity [FVC]) in SSc patients (pts) in a phase 2 trial. Objective: Investigate TCZ vs placebo (PBO) in SSc in a phase 3 trial. Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1 to double-blind subcutaneous TCZ 162 mg or PBO per week (wk) for 48 wks. Primary endpoint: difference (TCZ vs PBO) in modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) change from baseline (∆BL). Secondary endpoints: percent-predicted (pp)FVC; time to treatment failure (TTF; time from first study treatment to first occurrence of death, FVC decline >10%, mRSS increase ≥20% and mRSS ≥5, or occurrence of SSc complications); Health Assessment Questionnaire–Disability Index (HAQ-DI); pt/physician global assessment (Pt/PhGA) visual analog scale. Results: Of 106 PBO and 104 TCZ pts, 31% had previous/current interstitial lung disease based on their history. At wk 48, adjusted least-squares mean difference ∆BL mRSS PBO vs TCZ was –1.7 [95% CI: –3.8, 0.3], p=0.098). Cumulative distribution of ∆BL ppFVC (median [IQR] PBO –3.9 [–7.2, 0.6]; TCZ –0.6 [–5.3, 3.9] van Elteren nominal p=0.0015) and difference in mean ∆BL FVC at wk 48 (167 mL [95% CI: 83, 250]) favored TCZ. TTF hazard ratio (95% CI) was 0.6 (0.4, 1.1) numerically favoring TCZ (Cox proportional hazards p=0.082). No clinically meaningful difference was seen in mean (95% CI) difference ∆BL HAQ-DI –0.1 (–0.2, 0.1), PtGA –2.4 (–8.6, 3.7), PhGA –2.5 (–8.7, 3.8). Safety profile was consistent with SSc complications and TCZ treatment. Conclusion: The primary mRSS endpoint was not met. A clinically relevant difference in FVC was seen for TCZ vs PBO, with preservation of lung function.","PeriodicalId":178396,"journal":{"name":"ILD/DPLD of known origin","volume":"22 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ILD/DPLD of known origin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.rct1883","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: Anti–interleukin-6 receptor antibody TCZ showed clinically relevant lung function preservation (forced vital capacity [FVC]) in SSc patients (pts) in a phase 2 trial. Objective: Investigate TCZ vs placebo (PBO) in SSc in a phase 3 trial. Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1 to double-blind subcutaneous TCZ 162 mg or PBO per week (wk) for 48 wks. Primary endpoint: difference (TCZ vs PBO) in modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) change from baseline (∆BL). Secondary endpoints: percent-predicted (pp)FVC; time to treatment failure (TTF; time from first study treatment to first occurrence of death, FVC decline >10%, mRSS increase ≥20% and mRSS ≥5, or occurrence of SSc complications); Health Assessment Questionnaire–Disability Index (HAQ-DI); pt/physician global assessment (Pt/PhGA) visual analog scale. Results: Of 106 PBO and 104 TCZ pts, 31% had previous/current interstitial lung disease based on their history. At wk 48, adjusted least-squares mean difference ∆BL mRSS PBO vs TCZ was –1.7 [95% CI: –3.8, 0.3], p=0.098). Cumulative distribution of ∆BL ppFVC (median [IQR] PBO –3.9 [–7.2, 0.6]; TCZ –0.6 [–5.3, 3.9] van Elteren nominal p=0.0015) and difference in mean ∆BL FVC at wk 48 (167 mL [95% CI: 83, 250]) favored TCZ. TTF hazard ratio (95% CI) was 0.6 (0.4, 1.1) numerically favoring TCZ (Cox proportional hazards p=0.082). No clinically meaningful difference was seen in mean (95% CI) difference ∆BL HAQ-DI –0.1 (–0.2, 0.1), PtGA –2.4 (–8.6, 3.7), PhGA –2.5 (–8.7, 3.8). Safety profile was consistent with SSc complications and TCZ treatment. Conclusion: The primary mRSS endpoint was not met. A clinically relevant difference in FVC was seen for TCZ vs PBO, with preservation of lung function.
tocilizumab (TCZ)治疗系统性硬化症(SSc)的3期临床试验中的肺功能保护
背景:在一项2期临床试验中,抗白细胞介素-6受体抗体TCZ在SSc患者(pts)中显示出临床相关的肺功能保存(用力肺活量[FVC])。目的:在一项三期临床试验中研究TCZ与安慰剂(PBO)对SSc的疗效。方法:患者按1:1随机分组,每周(周)双盲皮下注射TCZ 162 mg或PBO 48周。主要终点:改良罗南皮肤评分(mRSS)与基线(∆BL)的差异(TCZ vs PBO)。次要终点:预测FVC百分比(pp);治疗失败时间;从首次研究治疗到首次死亡的时间,FVC下降>10%,mRSS升高≥20%且mRSS≥5,或出现SSc并发症);健康评估问卷-残疾指数;pt/医师整体评估(pt/ PhGA)视觉模拟量表。结果:在106名PBO和104名TCZ患者中,31%的患者根据病史有过或目前的间质性肺疾病。在第48周,校正最小二乘平均差∆BL mRSS PBO与TCZ为-1.7 [95% CI: -3.8, 0.3], p=0.098)。∆BL ppFVC累积分布(中位数[IQR] PBO -3.9 [-7.2, 0.6];TCZ -0.6 [-5.3, 3.9] van Elteren标称p=0.0015)和第48周平均∆BL FVC差异(167 mL [95% CI: 83, 250])有利于TCZ。TTF风险比(95% CI)为0.6(0.4,1.1),数值上有利于TCZ (Cox比例风险p=0.082)。平均(95% CI)差∆BL HAQ-DI -0.1(-0.2, 0.1)、PtGA -2.4(-8.6, 3.7)、PhGA -2.5(-8.7, 3.8)无临床意义。安全性与SSc并发症和TCZ治疗一致。结论:主要mRSS终点未达到。TCZ组与PBO组FVC有临床相关差异,但肺功能得以保存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信