Inclusion of marginalised communities during post-disaster context in Sri Lanka: what methodology?

Anjeli Mendis, M. Thayaparan, Y. Kaluarachchi
{"title":"Inclusion of marginalised communities during post-disaster context in Sri Lanka: what methodology?","authors":"Anjeli Mendis, M. Thayaparan, Y. Kaluarachchi","doi":"10.31705/wcs.2023.48","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research methodology is a general research strategy that defines how research should be carried out. It includes a system of beliefs and philosophical assumptions that shape the understanding of the research questions and underpins the choice of research methods. Additionally, research methodology is an integral part of any research and helps to ensure consistency between chosen tools, techniques, and underlying philosophy. Therefore, this article shows the perspectives to choose the most effective methodology to increase the inclusion of marginalised communities during the post-disaster phase in Sri Lanka. A systematic literature review comprising of 61 articles adopted as the best-suited methodology for this research. The philosophical position of this research is interpretivism, whereas the abductive approach is utilised for theory development. Hence, more than one qualitative data collection method is used, and this research adopts a multi-method qualitative approach. Furthermore, case study and survey strategies are chosen as the most suitable strategies for this research. Two Grama Niladhari divisions affected by natural disasters in Sri Lanka are selected as the cases. Data collection techniques adopted in this research are literature review, structured interviews, desk study, stakeholder interviews, key informant interviews, focus group discussions, and expert validation interviews. Data analysis techniques are literature synthesis, relative importance index, stakeholder analysis, and code-based content analysis. Furthermore, the article discusses how researchers achieve the reliability and validity of research findings and ethical considerations.","PeriodicalId":221447,"journal":{"name":"11th World Construction Symposium - 2023","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"11th World Construction Symposium - 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31705/wcs.2023.48","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research methodology is a general research strategy that defines how research should be carried out. It includes a system of beliefs and philosophical assumptions that shape the understanding of the research questions and underpins the choice of research methods. Additionally, research methodology is an integral part of any research and helps to ensure consistency between chosen tools, techniques, and underlying philosophy. Therefore, this article shows the perspectives to choose the most effective methodology to increase the inclusion of marginalised communities during the post-disaster phase in Sri Lanka. A systematic literature review comprising of 61 articles adopted as the best-suited methodology for this research. The philosophical position of this research is interpretivism, whereas the abductive approach is utilised for theory development. Hence, more than one qualitative data collection method is used, and this research adopts a multi-method qualitative approach. Furthermore, case study and survey strategies are chosen as the most suitable strategies for this research. Two Grama Niladhari divisions affected by natural disasters in Sri Lanka are selected as the cases. Data collection techniques adopted in this research are literature review, structured interviews, desk study, stakeholder interviews, key informant interviews, focus group discussions, and expert validation interviews. Data analysis techniques are literature synthesis, relative importance index, stakeholder analysis, and code-based content analysis. Furthermore, the article discusses how researchers achieve the reliability and validity of research findings and ethical considerations.
斯里兰卡灾后背景下边缘化社区的包容:什么方法?
研究方法是一种一般的研究策略,它定义了研究应该如何进行。它包括一套信念和哲学假设,这些信念和假设塑造了对研究问题的理解,并支撑了研究方法的选择。此外,研究方法是任何研究的一个组成部分,有助于确保所选择的工具、技术和基本哲学之间的一致性。因此,本文展示了在斯里兰卡灾后阶段选择最有效的方法来增加边缘化社区包容的观点。系统的文献综述包括61篇文章,采用了最适合本研究的方法。本研究的哲学立场是解释主义,而理论发展则采用溯因方法。因此,使用了多种定性数据收集方法,本研究采用了多方法定性方法。此外,案例研究和调查策略是本研究最适合的策略。选取斯里兰卡受自然灾害影响的两个Grama Niladhari区作为案例。本研究采用文献回顾、结构化访谈、案头研究、利益相关者访谈、关键线人访谈、焦点小组讨论和专家验证访谈等数据收集技术。数据分析技术包括文献综合、相对重要性指数、利益相关者分析和基于代码的内容分析。此外,本文还讨论了研究人员如何实现研究结果的信度和效度以及伦理考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信