Bandwidth-IPSec security trade-off in IPv4 and IPv6 in Windows 7 environment

S. S. Kolahi, Y. Cao, Hong Chen
{"title":"Bandwidth-IPSec security trade-off in IPv4 and IPv6 in Windows 7 environment","authors":"S. S. Kolahi, Y. Cao, Hong Chen","doi":"10.1109/FGCT.2013.6767214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to overheads of security algorithms used in IPSec, transferring data using IPSec is known to be significantly slow compared with open system. In this paper, we present new results on performance of IPSec using 7 encryption systems for both IPv4 and IPv6 using Windows 7 and wireless network access. For the system studied, enabling IPSec results in approximately 60%(IPv4) and 48%s(IPv6) lessTCP throughput compared to open system. Among encryption mechanisms, 3DES-SHA provides the highest TCP bandwidth for IPv4, while 3DES-MD5 gives the best result for IPv6. We also provide the results for UDP.","PeriodicalId":200083,"journal":{"name":"Second International Conference on Future Generation Communication Technologies (FGCT 2013)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Second International Conference on Future Generation Communication Technologies (FGCT 2013)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FGCT.2013.6767214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Due to overheads of security algorithms used in IPSec, transferring data using IPSec is known to be significantly slow compared with open system. In this paper, we present new results on performance of IPSec using 7 encryption systems for both IPv4 and IPv6 using Windows 7 and wireless network access. For the system studied, enabling IPSec results in approximately 60%(IPv4) and 48%s(IPv6) lessTCP throughput compared to open system. Among encryption mechanisms, 3DES-SHA provides the highest TCP bandwidth for IPv4, while 3DES-MD5 gives the best result for IPv6. We also provide the results for UDP.
Windows 7环境下IPv4和IPv6的带宽- ipsec安全权衡
由于IPSec中使用的安全算法的开销,与开放系统相比,使用IPSec传输数据要慢得多。在本文中,我们给出了在Windows 7和无线网络访问下使用7种加密系统对IPv4和IPv6的IPSec性能的新结果。对于所研究的系统,与打开系统相比,启用IPSec可以减少大约60%(IPv4)和48% (IPv6)的stcp吞吐量。在加密机制中,3DES-SHA为IPv4提供了最高的TCP带宽,3DES-MD5为IPv6提供了最好的结果。我们还提供了UDP的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信