A Contrastive Critical Analysis of George Floyd’s Death in China Daily and The New York Times

Yin-guan Qiu, Jiayun Li
{"title":"A Contrastive Critical Analysis of George Floyd’s Death in China Daily and The New York Times","authors":"Yin-guan Qiu, Jiayun Li","doi":"10.37745/bjel.2013/vol11n27994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on Fairclough’s three-dimensional model, the paper conducts a critical contrastive analysis of the reports related to George Floyd’s death in China Daily and The New York Times to reveal the hidden positions and ideologies of the Chinese and American media. It is found that at the description stage, China Daily objectively presents the main participants and holds a critical attitude towards the violent law enforcement, while The New York Times portrays George Floyd and the protesters as negative images and affirms the actions of the US police. In the interpretation level, specified sources and direct speeches are used more frequently in both media reports. But China Daily had a wide range of news sources, and a higher percentage of direct speeches than The New York Times. Regarding explanation, social factors and institutional factors contribute to the similarities and differences in constructing images of key players in the two media.","PeriodicalId":151808,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of English Language Linguistics","volume":"198 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of English Language Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37745/bjel.2013/vol11n27994","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on Fairclough’s three-dimensional model, the paper conducts a critical contrastive analysis of the reports related to George Floyd’s death in China Daily and The New York Times to reveal the hidden positions and ideologies of the Chinese and American media. It is found that at the description stage, China Daily objectively presents the main participants and holds a critical attitude towards the violent law enforcement, while The New York Times portrays George Floyd and the protesters as negative images and affirms the actions of the US police. In the interpretation level, specified sources and direct speeches are used more frequently in both media reports. But China Daily had a wide range of news sources, and a higher percentage of direct speeches than The New York Times. Regarding explanation, social factors and institutional factors contribute to the similarities and differences in constructing images of key players in the two media.
《中国日报》与《纽约时报》对弗洛伊德之死的对比分析
本文以费尔克劳的三维模型为基础,对《中国日报》和《纽约时报》关于弗洛伊德去世的报道进行批判性对比分析,揭示中美两国媒体隐藏的立场和意识形态。我们发现,在描述阶段,《中国日报》客观地呈现了主要参与者,对暴力执法持批判态度,而《纽约时报》则将乔治·弗洛伊德和抗议者描绘为负面形象,肯定了美国警方的行为。在口译层面,指明来源和直接引语在两种媒体报道中使用的频率更高。但《中国日报》拥有广泛的新闻来源,其直接发言的比例也高于《纽约时报》。在解释上,社会因素和制度因素导致了两种媒体在塑造关键人物形象方面的异同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信