Cross-Border Data Flows: An Evolving Multi-Layered Regulatory Approach Required!

Robert Walters
{"title":"Cross-Border Data Flows: An Evolving Multi-Layered Regulatory Approach Required!","authors":"Robert Walters","doi":"10.54648/gplr2022004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article will discuss the increasing importance of the multi-layered approach that personal data is taking in transnational cross-border data flows. It examines the role personal data plays in the evolving digital economy. The article will address a further accentuating question as to how far, if at all, the cross-border data flows are being considered in the area of national security. Throughout the outbreak of coronavirus, technology has been used by nation states to trace and collect health data of its citizens, in the interest of the broader national interest/security of individual states. Some states in developing the technology to track and trace their citizens went one step further and established bilateral agreements to share some of the data, such as Australia and Singapore. What emerged, was the evolving complex layers regulating while enabling data flows. The dichotomy facing governments and regulators is to allow for the free flow of personal data, while ensuring data subjects do not relinquish their privacy. To achieve this, I propose a Theory Of Action (TOA). Such an approach is widely accepted in other industry sectors where governments regulated a minimum standard, such as primary, human health and food production.\nCross-Border Data Flows, Data Transfers, Digital Economy, National Security, Trade in Data","PeriodicalId":127582,"journal":{"name":"Global Privacy Law Review","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Privacy Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/gplr2022004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article will discuss the increasing importance of the multi-layered approach that personal data is taking in transnational cross-border data flows. It examines the role personal data plays in the evolving digital economy. The article will address a further accentuating question as to how far, if at all, the cross-border data flows are being considered in the area of national security. Throughout the outbreak of coronavirus, technology has been used by nation states to trace and collect health data of its citizens, in the interest of the broader national interest/security of individual states. Some states in developing the technology to track and trace their citizens went one step further and established bilateral agreements to share some of the data, such as Australia and Singapore. What emerged, was the evolving complex layers regulating while enabling data flows. The dichotomy facing governments and regulators is to allow for the free flow of personal data, while ensuring data subjects do not relinquish their privacy. To achieve this, I propose a Theory Of Action (TOA). Such an approach is widely accepted in other industry sectors where governments regulated a minimum standard, such as primary, human health and food production. Cross-Border Data Flows, Data Transfers, Digital Economy, National Security, Trade in Data
跨境数据流:需要一种不断发展的多层次监管方法!
本文将讨论个人数据在跨国跨境数据流中所采用的多层次方法的重要性。它探讨了个人数据在不断发展的数字经济中所扮演的角色。本文将进一步强调一个问题,即在多大程度上,如果有的话,跨境数据流在国家安全领域得到了考虑。在整个冠状病毒爆发期间,为了维护各国更广泛的国家利益/安全,民族国家利用技术追踪和收集其公民的健康数据。一些开发追踪本国公民技术的国家更进了一步,建立了双边协议,共享部分数据,比如澳大利亚和新加坡。出现的是不断发展的复杂层,它们在调节数据流的同时使其成为可能。政府和监管机构面临的两难局面是,既要允许个人数据自由流动,又要确保数据主体不会放弃自己的隐私。为了实现这一点,我提出了一个行动理论(TOA)。这种做法在政府规定最低标准的其他工业部门得到广泛接受,例如初级、人类健康和粮食生产。跨境数据流,数据传输,数字经济,国家安全,数据贸易
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信