Context, method, and theory in CALL research articles

Yazdan Choubsaz, A. Jalilifar, A. Boulton
{"title":"Context, method, and theory in CALL research articles","authors":"Yazdan Choubsaz, A. Jalilifar, A. Boulton","doi":"10.14705/rpnet.2021.54.1308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is an initial report of the data analysis phase of a larger\n study that traces the evolution of Computer Assisted Language Learning\n (CALL). All published Research Articles (RAs) from four major CALL journals\n – ReCALL, CALL, Language Learning & Technology (LL&T) and CALICO\n Journal – from the very first issues to the end of 2019 were downloaded,\n sorted, and checked to form the final corpus of 426 highly cited RAs. The\n trends and themes (research contexts, research participants, and theoretical\n and methodological considerations of the RAs) were all recorded to see how\n CALL has evolved over time. Primary findings indicate that empirical studies\n where learners are physically or virtually involved in the process of\n technology-mediated language instruction dominate the field of CALL\n research. Authors resort to both quantitative and qualitative methodologies\n for data collection and analysis, though mixed-methods has gained more\n weight in the past two decades. Sociocultural theory stands over and above\n other theories in Second Language Acquisition (SLA) to frame CALL studies.\n The paper discusses these issues, and problems detected.","PeriodicalId":350173,"journal":{"name":"CALL and professionalisation: short papers from EUROCALL 2021","volume":"219 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CALL and professionalisation: short papers from EUROCALL 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2021.54.1308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper is an initial report of the data analysis phase of a larger study that traces the evolution of Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL). All published Research Articles (RAs) from four major CALL journals – ReCALL, CALL, Language Learning & Technology (LL&T) and CALICO Journal – from the very first issues to the end of 2019 were downloaded, sorted, and checked to form the final corpus of 426 highly cited RAs. The trends and themes (research contexts, research participants, and theoretical and methodological considerations of the RAs) were all recorded to see how CALL has evolved over time. Primary findings indicate that empirical studies where learners are physically or virtually involved in the process of technology-mediated language instruction dominate the field of CALL research. Authors resort to both quantitative and qualitative methodologies for data collection and analysis, though mixed-methods has gained more weight in the past two decades. Sociocultural theory stands over and above other theories in Second Language Acquisition (SLA) to frame CALL studies. The paper discusses these issues, and problems detected.
CALL研究文章的背景、方法和理论
本文是一项追踪计算机辅助语言学习(CALL)演变的大型研究的数据分析阶段的初步报告。从第一期到2019年底,所有发表在四种主要CALL期刊(ReCALL, CALL, Language Learning & Technology (LL&T)和CALICO Journal)上的研究论文(RAs)都被下载,排序和检查,形成426篇高被引RAs的最终语料库。趋势和主题(研究背景、研究参与者以及RAs的理论和方法考虑)都被记录下来,以了解CALL如何随着时间的推移而演变。主要研究结果表明,学习者实际或虚拟地参与技术介导的语言教学过程的实证研究占主导地位。作者在收集和分析数据时采用定量和定性两种方法,尽管混合方法在过去二十年中得到了更多的重视。在第二语言习得理论中,社会文化理论凌驾于其他理论之上,构成了CALL研究的框架。本文对这些问题进行了讨论,并发现了问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信