Detection of False Data Injection Attacks in Smart Grids Based on Forecasts

M. Kallitsis, Shrijita Bhattacharya, G. Michailidis
{"title":"Detection of False Data Injection Attacks in Smart Grids Based on Forecasts","authors":"M. Kallitsis, Shrijita Bhattacharya, G. Michailidis","doi":"10.1109/SmartGridComm.2018.8587473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The bi-directional communication capabilities that emerged into the smart power grid play a critical role in the grid’s secure, reliable and efficient operation. Nevertheless, the data communication functionalities introduced to Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) nodes end the grid’s isolation, and expose the network into an array of cyber-security threats that jeopardize the grid’s stability and availability. For instance, malware amenable to inject false data into the AMI can compromise the grid’s state estimation process and lead to catastrophic power outages. In this paper, we explore several statistical spatio-temporal models for efficient diagnosis of false data injection attacks in smart grids. The proposed methods leverage the data co-linearities that naturally arise in the AMI measurements of the electric network to provide forecasts for the network’s AMI observations, aiming to quickly detect the presence of “bad data”. We evaluate the proposed approaches with data tampered with stealth attacks compiled via three different attack strategies. Further, we juxtapose them against two other forecasting-aided detection methods appearing in the literature, and discuss the trade-offs of all techniques when employed on real-world power grid data, obtained from a large university campus.","PeriodicalId":213523,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications, Control, and Computing Technologies for Smart Grids (SmartGridComm)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications, Control, and Computing Technologies for Smart Grids (SmartGridComm)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SmartGridComm.2018.8587473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The bi-directional communication capabilities that emerged into the smart power grid play a critical role in the grid’s secure, reliable and efficient operation. Nevertheless, the data communication functionalities introduced to Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) nodes end the grid’s isolation, and expose the network into an array of cyber-security threats that jeopardize the grid’s stability and availability. For instance, malware amenable to inject false data into the AMI can compromise the grid’s state estimation process and lead to catastrophic power outages. In this paper, we explore several statistical spatio-temporal models for efficient diagnosis of false data injection attacks in smart grids. The proposed methods leverage the data co-linearities that naturally arise in the AMI measurements of the electric network to provide forecasts for the network’s AMI observations, aiming to quickly detect the presence of “bad data”. We evaluate the proposed approaches with data tampered with stealth attacks compiled via three different attack strategies. Further, we juxtapose them against two other forecasting-aided detection methods appearing in the literature, and discuss the trade-offs of all techniques when employed on real-world power grid data, obtained from a large university campus.
基于预测的智能电网虚假数据注入攻击检测
智能电网中出现的双向通信能力对电网的安全、可靠、高效运行起着至关重要的作用。然而,引入高级计量基础设施(AMI)节点的数据通信功能结束了电网的隔离,并使网络暴露在一系列网络安全威胁中,危及电网的稳定性和可用性。例如,恶意软件可以向AMI注入虚假数据,从而危及电网的状态估计过程,并导致灾难性的停电。在本文中,我们探索了几种用于有效诊断智能电网中虚假数据注入攻击的统计时空模型。所提出的方法利用在电网AMI测量中自然出现的数据共线性,为网络AMI观测提供预测,旨在快速检测“坏数据”的存在。我们通过三种不同的攻击策略编译了被隐形攻击篡改的数据来评估所提出的方法。此外,我们将它们与文献中出现的另外两种预测辅助检测方法并列,并讨论了在使用从大型大学校园获得的真实电网数据时所有技术的权衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信