Assessing Equity and Inclusion in Research Teams through Constructive Distributed Work

Shelton Weech, H. Banat, Michelle McMullin, Aleksandra M. Swatek, Anuj Gupta, B. Dilger
{"title":"Assessing Equity and Inclusion in Research Teams through Constructive Distributed Work","authors":"Shelton Weech, H. Banat, Michelle McMullin, Aleksandra M. Swatek, Anuj Gupta, B. Dilger","doi":"10.1109/ProComm53155.2022.00015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present results from a pilot study assessing the efficacy of a project management and team building heuristic by analyzing a recent grant writing project completed by an interdisciplinary, interinstitutional research group. That heuristic, “constructive distributed work” (CDW), integrates core principles for professional development (developing rhetorical confidence, using a networked model of mentoring, and sustained attention to infrastructure) with team-specific best practices mapped to the functions of collaborative work. The threedimensional nature of CDW affords both consideration of overall team effectiveness and its impacts on equity and inclusion. The pilot study confirmed the role the research group’s team communication platform played in successful coordination, and demonstrated how the research group’s commitment to rhetorical listening helped keep their collaboration inclusive. This pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of this method for collecting data and coding, and helps to set parameters for future research. We conclude by summarizing possible changes to the CDW heuristic and research design refinements suggested by the pilot study.","PeriodicalId":286504,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm)","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (ProComm)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ProComm53155.2022.00015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We present results from a pilot study assessing the efficacy of a project management and team building heuristic by analyzing a recent grant writing project completed by an interdisciplinary, interinstitutional research group. That heuristic, “constructive distributed work” (CDW), integrates core principles for professional development (developing rhetorical confidence, using a networked model of mentoring, and sustained attention to infrastructure) with team-specific best practices mapped to the functions of collaborative work. The threedimensional nature of CDW affords both consideration of overall team effectiveness and its impacts on equity and inclusion. The pilot study confirmed the role the research group’s team communication platform played in successful coordination, and demonstrated how the research group’s commitment to rhetorical listening helped keep their collaboration inclusive. This pilot study demonstrates the feasibility of this method for collecting data and coding, and helps to set parameters for future research. We conclude by summarizing possible changes to the CDW heuristic and research design refinements suggested by the pilot study.
通过建设性的分布式工作评估研究团队的公平性和包容性
我们通过分析一个跨学科、跨机构研究小组最近完成的拨款写作项目,提出了一项试点研究的结果,该研究评估了项目管理和团队建设启发式的有效性。这种启发式的“建设性的分布式工作”(CDW),将专业发展的核心原则(发展口头上的自信,使用指导的网络模型,以及对基础设施的持续关注)与团队特定的最佳实践映射到协作工作的功能中。CDW的三维性质既考虑了整体团队有效性,也考虑了其对公平和包容的影响。试点研究证实了研究小组的团队沟通平台在成功协调中发挥的作用,并展示了研究小组对修辞倾听的承诺如何帮助他们保持合作的包容性。本初步研究验证了该方法在数据采集和编码方面的可行性,并为今后的研究设定了参数。最后,我们总结了试点研究提出的CDW启发式和研究设计改进的可能变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信