Responsible Sourcing: The First Step Is the Hardest

Pia Ramchandani, Hamsa Bastani, Ken Moon
{"title":"Responsible Sourcing: The First Step Is the Hardest","authors":"Pia Ramchandani, Hamsa Bastani, Ken Moon","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3656497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Responsible sourcing is a priority for companies and consumers concerned with corporate social responsibility (CSR) in global supply chains. Most brands' product lines contain just a few products certified by third parties- which suggests that brands limit their efforts at ensuring that suppliers behave responsibly. In this paper, we examine a previously under-appreciated role of certifications: that certifications enable brands to learn about how to source responsibly. By successfully certifying even a single product, the certifying brand may enjoy positive, knowledge-based spillovers encouraging responsible sourcing throughout its product line. Using data on the responsible sourcing decisions of coffee brands in the $48B US consumer market, we find that certifying brands' rates of CSR violations (adjusted for disparities in production volume and detection) are similarly low regardless of whether the brand's portfolio is 3% certified or 100% certified- consistent with learning-based spillover effects. Certifying brands' violation rates are an estimated 61-78% lower than for comparable brands that make no CSR claims. While we find that brands making their own uncertified, on-packaging CSR claims also exhibit low CSR violation rates, their low violation rates are nearly entirely explained by the countries from which they source. In contrast, certifying brands appear uniquely able to source responsibly even from within \"high-risk\" countries. Our work novelly suggests that prevalent dual-sourcing may surprisingly amplify, rather than limit, responsible sourcing in supply chains, and that certified sourcing valuably develops the pool of responsible suppliers in high-risk countries.","PeriodicalId":355508,"journal":{"name":"Wharton School: Business Economics & Public Policy (Topic)","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wharton School: Business Economics & Public Policy (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3656497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Responsible sourcing is a priority for companies and consumers concerned with corporate social responsibility (CSR) in global supply chains. Most brands' product lines contain just a few products certified by third parties- which suggests that brands limit their efforts at ensuring that suppliers behave responsibly. In this paper, we examine a previously under-appreciated role of certifications: that certifications enable brands to learn about how to source responsibly. By successfully certifying even a single product, the certifying brand may enjoy positive, knowledge-based spillovers encouraging responsible sourcing throughout its product line. Using data on the responsible sourcing decisions of coffee brands in the $48B US consumer market, we find that certifying brands' rates of CSR violations (adjusted for disparities in production volume and detection) are similarly low regardless of whether the brand's portfolio is 3% certified or 100% certified- consistent with learning-based spillover effects. Certifying brands' violation rates are an estimated 61-78% lower than for comparable brands that make no CSR claims. While we find that brands making their own uncertified, on-packaging CSR claims also exhibit low CSR violation rates, their low violation rates are nearly entirely explained by the countries from which they source. In contrast, certifying brands appear uniquely able to source responsibly even from within "high-risk" countries. Our work novelly suggests that prevalent dual-sourcing may surprisingly amplify, rather than limit, responsible sourcing in supply chains, and that certified sourcing valuably develops the pool of responsible suppliers in high-risk countries.
负责任的采购:第一步是最难的
在全球供应链中,负责任的采购是关注企业社会责任(CSR)的公司和消费者的优先事项。大多数品牌的产品线只包含少数经过第三方认证的产品,这表明品牌在确保供应商负责任方面的努力有限。在本文中,我们研究了以前被低估的认证作用:认证使品牌能够了解如何负责任地采购。通过成功认证哪怕是一个产品,认证品牌可能会享受到积极的、基于知识的溢出效应,鼓励整个产品线的负责任采购。利用美国480亿美元消费市场中咖啡品牌负责任采购决策的数据,我们发现,无论品牌的产品组合是3%的认证还是100%的认证,认证品牌的CSR违规率(根据产量和检测差异进行调整)都同样低,这与基于学习的溢出效应一致。据估计,获得认证的品牌的违规率比没有提出企业社会责任要求的同类品牌低61-78%。虽然我们发现,那些自己制作未经认证的、包装上的企业社会责任声明的品牌也表现出较低的企业社会责任违规率,但它们的低违规率几乎完全是由它们的来源国解释的。相比之下,获得认证的品牌似乎是唯一能够负责任地从“高风险”国家采购的品牌。我们的研究新颖地表明,普遍存在的双重采购可能会出人意料地扩大(而不是限制)供应链中负责任的采购,并且认证采购有价值地发展了高风险国家中负责任的供应商库。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信