{"title":"The Principle of Reversing the Burden of Proof in Money Laundering Crimes","authors":"Arief Amrullah","doi":"10.26905/idjch.v14i2.10813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes the principle of reversal of the burden of proof adopted in Article 77 and Article 78 of the Law. The purpose is to explain related to the principle of presumption of innocence (presumption of innocence), which has been adopted in Article 66 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The normative legal research method examines authoritative texts as primary legal material and academic works as secondary legal material. The principle of reversal of the burden of proof in money laundering does not contradict the principle of presumption of innocence. On the contrary, the TPPU Law has placed defendants with legal subjects who deserve respect for their human rights to explain the origin of their assets not obtained from the proceeds of crime. The inability to explain the origin of the property does not make him guilty and criminalized. Because the Public Prosecutor is still obliged to prove his charges.How to cite item: Amrullah, M. Arief. “The Principle of Reversing the Burden of Proof in Money Laundering Crimes.” Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum 14 no. 2 (2023): 146-154. DOI: doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v14i2.10813.","PeriodicalId":207438,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum","volume":"315 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v14i2.10813","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article analyzes the principle of reversal of the burden of proof adopted in Article 77 and Article 78 of the Law. The purpose is to explain related to the principle of presumption of innocence (presumption of innocence), which has been adopted in Article 66 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The normative legal research method examines authoritative texts as primary legal material and academic works as secondary legal material. The principle of reversal of the burden of proof in money laundering does not contradict the principle of presumption of innocence. On the contrary, the TPPU Law has placed defendants with legal subjects who deserve respect for their human rights to explain the origin of their assets not obtained from the proceeds of crime. The inability to explain the origin of the property does not make him guilty and criminalized. Because the Public Prosecutor is still obliged to prove his charges.How to cite item: Amrullah, M. Arief. “The Principle of Reversing the Burden of Proof in Money Laundering Crimes.” Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum 14 no. 2 (2023): 146-154. DOI: doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v14i2.10813.
本文分析了《民法通则》第77条和第78条所采用的举证责任倒置原则。目的是对《刑事诉讼法》第66条所采用的无罪推定原则(推定无罪)进行相关说明。规范性法律研究方法将权威文本作为主要法律材料,将学术著作作为次要法律材料。洗钱举证责任倒置原则与无罪推定原则并不矛盾。相反,《反洗钱法》将被告交给人权应得到尊重的法律主体,由其解释其非从犯罪收益中获得的资产的来源。无法解释财产的来源并不能使他有罪和犯罪。因为公诉人仍然有义务证明他的指控。如何引用条目:Amrullah, M. Arief。“洗钱犯罪举证责任倒置原则”学报,第14期。2(2023): 146-154。DOI: doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v14i2.10813。