Hibah Wasiat Atas Tanah Bekas Adat Berdasarkan Akta Hibah Wasiat Yang Dibuat Oleh Camat

Andi Ainun Magfirah Ramadhani, M. Basri, M. Arisaputra
{"title":"Hibah Wasiat Atas Tanah Bekas Adat Berdasarkan Akta Hibah Wasiat Yang Dibuat Oleh Camat","authors":"Andi Ainun Magfirah Ramadhani, M. Basri, M. Arisaputra","doi":"10.31328/wy.v5i2.3641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A testamentary grant on ex-customary land as an object of the dispute by looking at the Court's Decision which decided on a civil dispute case Number: 21/Pdt.G/2015/PN/BLK which in its decision rejected the plaintiff's claim that the ex-customary land belonged to him, because the defendant has proof of ownership, namely a will grant deed carried out by the Camat as PPATS. This study aims to analyze the strength of the proof of the will as the basis for land tenure and ownership, as well as to analyze the validity of ownership and control of ex-customary land rights based on the testament grant deed made by the sub-district head as PPATS. This study uses empirical research methods, by analyzing the data collected through interviews and literature study, then the collected data is analyzed using descriptive analysis techniques. The results of this study indicate that the testament grant deed in the case of the Civil dispute Number 21/Pdt.G/2015/PN/BLK does not have a basis of manufacture where the will grant deed does not have a certificate and is only made in front of the sub-district head as PPATS, further should have been canceled by the Bulukumba District Court because it was not following the procedure for making a will and the beneficiary","PeriodicalId":106813,"journal":{"name":"Widya Yuridika","volume":"221 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Widya Yuridika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31328/wy.v5i2.3641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A testamentary grant on ex-customary land as an object of the dispute by looking at the Court's Decision which decided on a civil dispute case Number: 21/Pdt.G/2015/PN/BLK which in its decision rejected the plaintiff's claim that the ex-customary land belonged to him, because the defendant has proof of ownership, namely a will grant deed carried out by the Camat as PPATS. This study aims to analyze the strength of the proof of the will as the basis for land tenure and ownership, as well as to analyze the validity of ownership and control of ex-customary land rights based on the testament grant deed made by the sub-district head as PPATS. This study uses empirical research methods, by analyzing the data collected through interviews and literature study, then the collected data is analyzed using descriptive analysis techniques. The results of this study indicate that the testament grant deed in the case of the Civil dispute Number 21/Pdt.G/2015/PN/BLK does not have a basis of manufacture where the will grant deed does not have a certificate and is only made in front of the sub-district head as PPATS, further should have been canceled by the Bulukumba District Court because it was not following the procedure for making a will and the beneficiary
根据法院就民事纠纷案件作出的裁决,将以前习惯土地的遗嘱授予作为争议对象。G/2015/PN/BLK在其决定中驳回了原告关于以前习惯土地属于他的主张,因为被告有所有权证明,即由Camat作为PPATS执行的遗嘱授予契约。本研究旨在分析作为土地权属和所有权基础的遗嘱证明的力度,并以街道负责人作为PPATS的遗嘱授予契约为基础,分析以往土地权利的所有权和控制权的有效性。本研究采用实证研究方法,通过访谈法和文献研究法对收集到的数据进行分析,然后采用描述性分析技术对收集到的数据进行分析。本研究结果表明,遗嘱授予契据在民事纠纷案件中的应用数量为21/Pdt。G/2015/PN/BLK没有制作基础,其中遗嘱授予契约没有证书,只是在分区负责人面前作为PPATS制作,进一步应该被Bulukumba地区法院取消,因为它没有遵循制定遗嘱和受益人的程序
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信