[Palm stimulation in carpal tunnel syndrome].

Rivista di neurologia Pub Date : 1990-09-01
S Rossi, F Giannini, R Cioni, C Paradiso, S Passero, F Belardinelli, N Battistini
{"title":"[Palm stimulation in carpal tunnel syndrome].","authors":"S Rossi,&nbsp;F Giannini,&nbsp;R Cioni,&nbsp;C Paradiso,&nbsp;S Passero,&nbsp;F Belardinelli,&nbsp;N Battistini","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In order to verify the sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV) by median nerve palmar stimulation regard to each single finger, we tested 48 patients with typical CTS symptoms, confirmed by neurophysiological examination. The control group consisted of twenty-seven healthy volunteers, of similar mean age. The SNCVs were obtained by stimulating the II finger (M2), III (M3), IV (M4) and II and III intermetacarpo-phalangeal site (respectively P2 and P3) for median nerve; IV finger (U4) and IV intermetacarpophalangeal site (P4) for ulnar nerve. Data show that P2 was normal in 3 cases (6.2%), as was M2; M3 in 2 cases (4.2%) and P3 only in one case (2.1%). No sensory nerve action potential was recorded in 3 case (6.2%) during P3 stimulation, in comparison to 14 cases (29.2%) during M4 stimulation. When each case was examined separately, the behaviour of palmar SNCV resulted similar to the corresponding fingers. Finally, the ratio between SNCV values of P2/P3, with respect to controls, showed a further more severe damage of P3 compared to the P2, generally preferred by other authors.</p>","PeriodicalId":76494,"journal":{"name":"Rivista di neurologia","volume":"60 5","pages":"186-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rivista di neurologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In order to verify the sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV) by median nerve palmar stimulation regard to each single finger, we tested 48 patients with typical CTS symptoms, confirmed by neurophysiological examination. The control group consisted of twenty-seven healthy volunteers, of similar mean age. The SNCVs were obtained by stimulating the II finger (M2), III (M3), IV (M4) and II and III intermetacarpo-phalangeal site (respectively P2 and P3) for median nerve; IV finger (U4) and IV intermetacarpophalangeal site (P4) for ulnar nerve. Data show that P2 was normal in 3 cases (6.2%), as was M2; M3 in 2 cases (4.2%) and P3 only in one case (2.1%). No sensory nerve action potential was recorded in 3 case (6.2%) during P3 stimulation, in comparison to 14 cases (29.2%) during M4 stimulation. When each case was examined separately, the behaviour of palmar SNCV resulted similar to the corresponding fingers. Finally, the ratio between SNCV values of P2/P3, with respect to controls, showed a further more severe damage of P3 compared to the P2, generally preferred by other authors.

[手掌刺激腕管综合征]。
为了验证正中神经掌部刺激对单个手指的感觉神经传导速度(SNCV),我们测试了48例典型CTS症状的患者,并进行了神经生理检查。对照组由27名平均年龄相仿的健康志愿者组成。通过刺激第II指(M2)、第III指(M3)、第IV指(M4)和第II、III指间区(分别为P2和P3)正中神经获得sncv;尺神经静脉注射(U4)及掌指关节间静脉注射(P4)。资料显示3例(6.2%)P2正常,M2正常;M3 2例(4.2%),P3 1例(2.1%)。P3刺激3例(6.2%)无感觉神经动作电位记录,M4刺激14例(29.2%)无感觉神经动作电位记录。当每个病例单独检查时,手掌SNCV的行为与相应的手指相似。最后,相对于对照,P2/P3的SNCV值之比表明,P3的损害比P2更严重,这通常是其他作者的首选。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信