“My AI must have been broken”: How AI Stands to Reshape Human Communication

Mor Naaman
{"title":"“My AI must have been broken”: How AI Stands to Reshape Human Communication","authors":"Mor Naaman","doi":"10.1145/3523227.3555724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From autocomplete and smart replies to video filters and deepfakes, we increasingly live in a world where communication between humans is augmented by artificial intelligence. AI often operates on behalf of a human communicator by recommending, suggesting, modifying, or generating messages to accomplish communication goals. We call this phenomenon AI-Mediated Communication (or AI-MC) [1, 4]. While AI-MC has the potential of making human communication more efficient, it impacts other aspects of our communication in ways that are not yet well understood. Over the last three years, my collaborators and I have been documenting the impact of AI-MC on communication outcomes, language use, interpersonal trust, and more. The talk will outline early experimental findings from this work, mostly led by Cornell and Stanford graduate students Maurice Jakesch, Hannah Mieczkowski, and Jess Hohenstein. For example, the research shows that AI-MC involvement can result in language shifting towards positivity [2, 7]; impact the evaluation of others [2, 4]; change the extent to which we take ownership over our messages [6]; and shift assignment of blame for communication outcomes [3]. Given the impact of AI-MC on interpersonal evaluations, the talk will also cover our recent research examining the (mostly false) heuristics humans use when evaluating whether text was written by AI [5]. Overall, AI-MC raises significant practical and ethical concerns as it stands to reshape human communication, calling for new approaches to the development and regulation of these technologies.","PeriodicalId":443279,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3523227.3555724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

From autocomplete and smart replies to video filters and deepfakes, we increasingly live in a world where communication between humans is augmented by artificial intelligence. AI often operates on behalf of a human communicator by recommending, suggesting, modifying, or generating messages to accomplish communication goals. We call this phenomenon AI-Mediated Communication (or AI-MC) [1, 4]. While AI-MC has the potential of making human communication more efficient, it impacts other aspects of our communication in ways that are not yet well understood. Over the last three years, my collaborators and I have been documenting the impact of AI-MC on communication outcomes, language use, interpersonal trust, and more. The talk will outline early experimental findings from this work, mostly led by Cornell and Stanford graduate students Maurice Jakesch, Hannah Mieczkowski, and Jess Hohenstein. For example, the research shows that AI-MC involvement can result in language shifting towards positivity [2, 7]; impact the evaluation of others [2, 4]; change the extent to which we take ownership over our messages [6]; and shift assignment of blame for communication outcomes [3]. Given the impact of AI-MC on interpersonal evaluations, the talk will also cover our recent research examining the (mostly false) heuristics humans use when evaluating whether text was written by AI [5]. Overall, AI-MC raises significant practical and ethical concerns as it stands to reshape human communication, calling for new approaches to the development and regulation of these technologies.
“我的人工智能肯定坏了”:人工智能如何重塑人类交流
从自动补全和智能回复,到视频过滤器和深度造假,我们越来越生活在一个人工智能增强了人与人之间交流的世界。人工智能通常通过推荐、建议、修改或生成消息来代表人类沟通者进行操作,以实现沟通目标。我们将这种现象称为AI-Mediated Communication (AI-MC)[1,4]。虽然AI-MC有可能使人类的沟通更有效率,但它对我们沟通的其他方面的影响还没有得到很好的理解。在过去的三年里,我和我的合作者一直在记录AI-MC对沟通结果、语言使用、人际信任等方面的影响。讲座将概述这项工作的早期实验结果,主要由康奈尔大学和斯坦福大学的研究生莫里斯·杰克什、汉娜·米茨科夫斯基和杰斯·霍恩斯坦领导。例如,研究表明AI-MC参与可以导致语言向积极方向转变[2,7];影响他人评价[2,4];改变我们对信息的掌控程度[6];并转移沟通结果的责任分配[3]。鉴于AI- mc对人际评价的影响,演讲还将涵盖我们最近的研究,该研究检查了人类在评估文本是否由AI编写时使用的启发式(大多是错误的)[5]。总的来说,AI-MC引起了重大的实践和伦理问题,因为它将重塑人类的沟通,要求对这些技术的开发和监管采取新的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信