FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT : A "COINCIDENTAL" COMPETENCE OF THE EU?

Christoph Herrmann, Judith Crämer
{"title":"FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT : A \"COINCIDENTAL\" COMPETENCE OF THE EU?","authors":"Christoph Herrmann, Judith Crämer","doi":"10.15057/27099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article gives an overview of the current status of EU foreign investment policy and outlines the direction in which it is headed. It is also testimony to the fact that when the competence for foreign direct investment was conferred upon the EU, deliberations on what this should entail were not really made. To begin with, the powers of the EU with respect to Hitotsubashi Journal of Law and Politics 43 (2015), pp.85-109. C Hitotsubashi University * The Author, Prof. Dr. Christoph Herrmann, LL.M. (London) holds the Chair for Constitutional and Administrative Law, European Law, European and International Economic Law at the University of Passau and is Academic Director of the Certificate of Studies in European, Comparative and International Law (CECIL) programme. Email: christoph.herrmann@uni-passau.de. ** Judith Crämer, LL.M. (Maastricht, Toulouse) is research assistant and PhD candidate at the Chair of Professor Herrmann at the University of Passau and Coordinator of CECIL. Email: judith.craemer@uni-passau.de. FDI before and after the Treaty of Lisbon entered into force are presented. As the EU has been empowered to regulate FDI matters for its Member States since the Treaty of Lisbon entered into force, there is potential for conflict. Therefore, the second part of this paper analyses the current legal status of intraand extra-EU BITs and presents the BITs Regulation, a first attempt of the EU to define its competence and bring clarity with respect to the legal status of extra-EU BITs. Additionally, the special status of the Energy Charter Treaty is addressed. The third part of the paper will concentrate on the shape the common European investment policy might take in the future, with express reference to the new role of the instutions in regulating FDI and their positions towards FDI as a new competence. It seems from the EU-Canada trade agreement, which may be the first agreement to be concluded under the new competence, that the EU is opting for a rather broad competence including preand post-establishment of investments as well as portfolio investments. The European citizens, however, are not in favour of concluding any agreement. It will be concluded that the transfer of the competence was sudden, but the foundation for a solid European policy has been laid in the past five years.","PeriodicalId":208983,"journal":{"name":"Hitotsubashi journal of law and politics","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hitotsubashi journal of law and politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15057/27099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article gives an overview of the current status of EU foreign investment policy and outlines the direction in which it is headed. It is also testimony to the fact that when the competence for foreign direct investment was conferred upon the EU, deliberations on what this should entail were not really made. To begin with, the powers of the EU with respect to Hitotsubashi Journal of Law and Politics 43 (2015), pp.85-109. C Hitotsubashi University * The Author, Prof. Dr. Christoph Herrmann, LL.M. (London) holds the Chair for Constitutional and Administrative Law, European Law, European and International Economic Law at the University of Passau and is Academic Director of the Certificate of Studies in European, Comparative and International Law (CECIL) programme. Email: christoph.herrmann@uni-passau.de. ** Judith Crämer, LL.M. (Maastricht, Toulouse) is research assistant and PhD candidate at the Chair of Professor Herrmann at the University of Passau and Coordinator of CECIL. Email: judith.craemer@uni-passau.de. FDI before and after the Treaty of Lisbon entered into force are presented. As the EU has been empowered to regulate FDI matters for its Member States since the Treaty of Lisbon entered into force, there is potential for conflict. Therefore, the second part of this paper analyses the current legal status of intraand extra-EU BITs and presents the BITs Regulation, a first attempt of the EU to define its competence and bring clarity with respect to the legal status of extra-EU BITs. Additionally, the special status of the Energy Charter Treaty is addressed. The third part of the paper will concentrate on the shape the common European investment policy might take in the future, with express reference to the new role of the instutions in regulating FDI and their positions towards FDI as a new competence. It seems from the EU-Canada trade agreement, which may be the first agreement to be concluded under the new competence, that the EU is opting for a rather broad competence including preand post-establishment of investments as well as portfolio investments. The European citizens, however, are not in favour of concluding any agreement. It will be concluded that the transfer of the competence was sudden, but the foundation for a solid European policy has been laid in the past five years.
外国直接投资:欧盟的“巧合”能力?
本文概述了欧盟对外投资政策的现状,并概述了其发展方向。这也证明了这样一个事实:当外国直接投资(fdi)的权限被授予欧盟(EU)时,并没有真正考虑过这应该包含哪些内容。《法律与政治》第43期(2015),pp.85-109。*作者Christoph Herrmann博士教授,法学硕士(伦敦)在帕绍大学担任宪法和行政法、欧洲法、欧洲和国际经济法讲席,并担任欧洲、比较法和国际法研究证书课程的学术主任。电子邮件:christoph.herrmann@uni-passau.de。** Judith Crämer, LL.M.(马斯特里赫特,图卢兹),法国帕绍大学Herrmann教授的研究助理和博士生,CECIL协调员。电子邮件:judith.craemer@uni-passau.de。介绍了《里斯本条约》生效前后的外国直接投资情况。由于自《里斯本条约》生效以来,欧盟已被授权为其成员国管理外国直接投资事宜,因此存在发生冲突的可能性。因此,本文的第二部分分析了欧盟内外双边投资协定的法律现状,并提出了双边投资协定法规,这是欧盟首次尝试界定其权限,并明确欧盟外双边投资协定的法律地位。此外,还讨论了《能源宪章条约》的特殊地位。本文的第三部分将集中讨论欧洲共同投资政策未来可能采取的形式,并明确提到各机构在管理外国直接投资方面的新作用及其对外国直接投资作为一种新能力的立场。从欧盟-加拿大贸易协定(这可能是在新权限下达成的第一个协议)来看,欧盟似乎选择了一个相当广泛的权限,包括建立前和建立后投资以及证券投资。然而,欧洲公民不赞成达成任何协议。结论是,权力的转移是突然的,但坚实的欧洲政策的基础已经在过去五年中奠定了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信