A "New" View of Proof-of-Concept Practices Through the Lenses of Activity Theory and Hermeneutics

Antonio Jose Rodrigues Neto, M. M. Borges, Licinio Gomes Roque
{"title":"A \"New\" View of Proof-of-Concept Practices Through the Lenses of Activity Theory and Hermeneutics","authors":"Antonio Jose Rodrigues Neto, M. M. Borges, Licinio Gomes Roque","doi":"10.4018/jitr.2020100108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, the authors acknowledge Proof-of-Concept (PoC) as an activity with a set of practices performed by its practitioners and consumed by organizations that aim to explore new products or technologies and achieve knowledge production and consumption. PoC practices are poorly explored and characterized in the scientific literature. The motivation of this research is the clarification of an approach to PoC. This article introduces a “new” and different view of PoC practices using Activity Theory and Hermeneutics. The authors debate that it is not possible to understand the whole PoC until its constituent parts and context have been understood. Therefore, the process of appropriation of knowledge in PoC occurs in social interaction between one practitioner and another, through an activity that is mediated in the relations between those practitioners, and an activity between the triad—subject (practitioner), object of learning (outcome), and mediating artifacts—with the aim of improving PoC practices.","PeriodicalId":296080,"journal":{"name":"J. Inf. Technol. Res.","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Inf. Technol. Res.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/jitr.2020100108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In this study, the authors acknowledge Proof-of-Concept (PoC) as an activity with a set of practices performed by its practitioners and consumed by organizations that aim to explore new products or technologies and achieve knowledge production and consumption. PoC practices are poorly explored and characterized in the scientific literature. The motivation of this research is the clarification of an approach to PoC. This article introduces a “new” and different view of PoC practices using Activity Theory and Hermeneutics. The authors debate that it is not possible to understand the whole PoC until its constituent parts and context have been understood. Therefore, the process of appropriation of knowledge in PoC occurs in social interaction between one practitioner and another, through an activity that is mediated in the relations between those practitioners, and an activity between the triad—subject (practitioner), object of learning (outcome), and mediating artifacts—with the aim of improving PoC practices.
从活动理论和解释学的角度看概念证明实践的“新”观点
在本研究中,作者承认概念验证(PoC)是一种活动,由其实践者执行一系列实践,并由旨在探索新产品或技术并实现知识生产和消费的组织使用。PoC实践在科学文献中很少被探索和描述。本研究的动机是澄清PoC的一种方法。本文运用活动理论和解释学,介绍了一种“新”的、不同的PoC实践观点。作者认为,在理解PoC的组成部分和上下文之前,不可能理解整个PoC。因此,PoC中的知识占有过程发生在一个实践者和另一个实践者之间的社会互动中,通过在实践者之间的关系中中介的活动,以及在三元主体(实践者)、学习对象(结果)和中介工件之间的活动,目的是改善PoC实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信