Implementation of Process-Oriented Feedback in a Clinical Reasoning Tool for Virtual Patients

Inga Hege, Andrzej A. Kononowicz, M. Nowakowski, M. Adler
{"title":"Implementation of Process-Oriented Feedback in a Clinical Reasoning Tool for Virtual Patients","authors":"Inga Hege, Andrzej A. Kononowicz, M. Nowakowski, M. Adler","doi":"10.1109/CBMS.2017.76","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Virtual patients (VPs) offer a safe environment to teach clinical reasoning skills, but feedback is often provided in outcome-, rather than process-oriented fashion. For complex cognitive skills, such as clinical reasoning, the process itself is often more important than the end result, especially during the learning phase. We have developed a tool that can be integrated into VP systems to specifically support the clinical reasoning process and provides process- and outcome-oriented feedback. In a pilot study we explored students usage patterns and satisfaction depending on the feedback type. We did not detect any significant differences between the groups and the time on task indicates similar engagement in both groups. The responses from the satisfaction survey show areas for further development.","PeriodicalId":141105,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE 30th International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE 30th International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CBMS.2017.76","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Virtual patients (VPs) offer a safe environment to teach clinical reasoning skills, but feedback is often provided in outcome-, rather than process-oriented fashion. For complex cognitive skills, such as clinical reasoning, the process itself is often more important than the end result, especially during the learning phase. We have developed a tool that can be integrated into VP systems to specifically support the clinical reasoning process and provides process- and outcome-oriented feedback. In a pilot study we explored students usage patterns and satisfaction depending on the feedback type. We did not detect any significant differences between the groups and the time on task indicates similar engagement in both groups. The responses from the satisfaction survey show areas for further development.
面向过程的反馈在虚拟患者临床推理工具中的实现
虚拟病人(VPs)为教授临床推理技能提供了一个安全的环境,但反馈往往以结果为导向,而不是以过程为导向。对于复杂的认知技能,如临床推理,过程本身往往比最终结果更重要,尤其是在学习阶段。我们开发了一种工具,可以集成到VP系统中,专门支持临床推理过程,并提供面向过程和结果的反馈。在一项初步研究中,我们根据反馈类型探索了学生的使用模式和满意度。我们没有发现两组之间有任何显著的差异,任务时间表明两组的投入程度相似。满意度调查的回应显示出有待进一步发展的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信