Cache scrubbing in microprocessors: myth or necessity?

Shubhendu S. Mukherjee, J. Emer, T. Fossum, S. Reinhardt
{"title":"Cache scrubbing in microprocessors: myth or necessity?","authors":"Shubhendu S. Mukherjee, J. Emer, T. Fossum, S. Reinhardt","doi":"10.1109/PRDC.2004.1276550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Transient faults from neutron and alpha particle strikes in large SRAM caches have become a major problem for microprocessor designers. To protect these caches, designers often use error correcting codes (ECC), which typically provide single-bit error correction and double-bit error detection (SECDED). Unfortunately, two separate strikes could still flip two different bits in the same ECC-protected word. This we call a temporal double-bit error. SECDED ECC can only detect, not correct such errors. We show how to compute the mean time to failure for temporal double-bit errors. Additionally, we show how fixed-interval scrubbing - in which error checkers periodically access cache blocks and remove single-bit errors - can mitigate such errors in processor caches. Our analysis using current soft error rates shows that only very large caches (e.g., hundreds of megabytes to gigabytes) need scrubbing to reduce the temporal double-bit error rate to a tolerable range.","PeriodicalId":383639,"journal":{"name":"10th IEEE Pacific Rim International Symposium on Dependable Computing, 2004. Proceedings.","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-03-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"146","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"10th IEEE Pacific Rim International Symposium on Dependable Computing, 2004. Proceedings.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PRDC.2004.1276550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 146

Abstract

Transient faults from neutron and alpha particle strikes in large SRAM caches have become a major problem for microprocessor designers. To protect these caches, designers often use error correcting codes (ECC), which typically provide single-bit error correction and double-bit error detection (SECDED). Unfortunately, two separate strikes could still flip two different bits in the same ECC-protected word. This we call a temporal double-bit error. SECDED ECC can only detect, not correct such errors. We show how to compute the mean time to failure for temporal double-bit errors. Additionally, we show how fixed-interval scrubbing - in which error checkers periodically access cache blocks and remove single-bit errors - can mitigate such errors in processor caches. Our analysis using current soft error rates shows that only very large caches (e.g., hundreds of megabytes to gigabytes) need scrubbing to reduce the temporal double-bit error rate to a tolerable range.
微处理器中的缓存清理:神话还是必要?
在大型SRAM高速缓存中,中子和α粒子撞击引起的瞬态故障已经成为微处理器设计人员面临的主要问题。为了保护这些缓存,设计人员通常使用纠错码(ECC),它通常提供单比特纠错和双比特错误检测(SECDED)。不幸的是,两次单独的打击仍然可以在同一个ecc保护字中翻转两个不同的位。我们称之为时间双比特误差。SECDED ECC只能检测,不能纠正此类错误。我们将展示如何计算暂时双位错误的平均失效时间。此外,我们还展示了固定间隔清洗(错误检查器定期访问缓存块并删除单比特错误)如何减轻处理器缓存中的此类错误。我们使用当前软错误率进行的分析表明,只有非常大的缓存(例如,数百兆字节到千兆字节)需要清除以将暂时的双比特错误率降低到可容忍的范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信