Accessibility, Quality and Performance of Government Portals and Ministry Web Sites: A View Using Diagnostic Tools

Winfred Yaokumah, Steven Brown, R. Amponsah
{"title":"Accessibility, Quality and Performance of Government Portals and Ministry Web Sites: A View Using Diagnostic Tools","authors":"Winfred Yaokumah, Steven Brown, R. Amponsah","doi":"10.1109/GOCICT.2015.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accessibility, quality, and performance of government websites and portals are key issues for e-government programmes. Although the number of government sites has increased rapidly in the past few years, their ultimate success will largely depend on their accessibility, quality and performance. This paper reports the results of an evaluative study of 19 e-government websites and portals using a common set of Web diagnostic engines. The findings reveal that none of the sites evaluated meet the recommended Priority AA conformance level. A number of accessibility, quality, and performance weaknesses were identified. Majority of the sites assessed fail to comply with perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust principles of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG). Several non-compliance errors were found on the websites. The page load time for most sites falls far below the acceptable level, spelling errors and bad links were also found. Significant work needs to be done in order to make these websites examples of best practice e-government sites.","PeriodicalId":221523,"journal":{"name":"2015 Annual Global Online Conference on Information and Computer Technology (GOCICT)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 Annual Global Online Conference on Information and Computer Technology (GOCICT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/GOCICT.2015.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Accessibility, quality, and performance of government websites and portals are key issues for e-government programmes. Although the number of government sites has increased rapidly in the past few years, their ultimate success will largely depend on their accessibility, quality and performance. This paper reports the results of an evaluative study of 19 e-government websites and portals using a common set of Web diagnostic engines. The findings reveal that none of the sites evaluated meet the recommended Priority AA conformance level. A number of accessibility, quality, and performance weaknesses were identified. Majority of the sites assessed fail to comply with perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust principles of the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG). Several non-compliance errors were found on the websites. The page load time for most sites falls far below the acceptable level, spelling errors and bad links were also found. Significant work needs to be done in order to make these websites examples of best practice e-government sites.
政府门户网站和部门网站的可访问性、质量和性能:使用诊断工具的观点
政府网站及入口网站的易读性、质素及表现,是电子政府计划的主要问题。虽然政府网站的数目在过去几年迅速增加,但它们的最终成功与否,在很大程度上取决于它们的无障碍程度、质素和表现。本文报告了使用一套通用的Web诊断引擎对19个电子政务网站和门户网站进行评估研究的结果。调查结果显示,没有一个被评估的站点达到建议的优先AA一致性级别。确定了许多可访问性、质量和性能弱点。被评估的大多数站点都没有遵守Web内容可访问性指南(WCAG)的可感知、可操作、可理解和健壮的原则。在网站上发现了一些不合规的错误。大多数网站的页面加载时间远远低于可接受的水平,拼写错误和不良链接也被发现。为了使这些网站成为最佳实践电子政务网站的例子,需要做大量的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信