What Role for the Commission and the ECB in the European Stability Mechanism?

Anastasia Karatzia, Menelaos Markakis
{"title":"What Role for the Commission and the ECB in the European Stability Mechanism?","authors":"Anastasia Karatzia, Menelaos Markakis","doi":"10.4337/cilj.2017.02.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the transformation of the role of the European Commission and the European Central Bank (ECB) in the context of the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU), from institutions acting within the EU institutional framework, to actors taking on new tasks in the realm of international law as part of the structure of the European Stability Mechanism (ESM). It expounds the legal framework applying to the two institutions in the ESM by analysing the currently applicable legislation as well as recent case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) (Ledra and Mallis). It argues that the applicable legal framework remains underdeveloped and unclear, especially with regard to the obligations incumbent on the ECB in the ESM, which have not yet been examined by the EU courts. Exploring the main challenges resulting from the ambiguity of the tasks and obligations conferred on the two EU institutions in the ESM, the article argues that all EU law applies in principle to the activities of the EU institutions in the ESM. It then shifts the focus to political and legal accountability, the emphasis being on direct and indirect actions before the CJEU, including the vexed issue of liability of the EU institutions for damages caused by their actions in the ESM. The article concludes with a forward-looking assessment in light of the Five Presidents’ Report on Completing the EMU, which stipulates that the governance of the ESM should be integrated within the framework of EU law. The article questions whether a future incorporation of the ESM’s governance in EU law could address any of the challenges resulting from the current uncertainty about the role and potential liability of the Commission and the ECB for their actions in the ESM, and makes a number of recommendations as to how the ESM should be incorporated into EU law.","PeriodicalId":121229,"journal":{"name":"European Public Law: National eJournal","volume":"122 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Public Law: National eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/cilj.2017.02.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This article examines the transformation of the role of the European Commission and the European Central Bank (ECB) in the context of the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU), from institutions acting within the EU institutional framework, to actors taking on new tasks in the realm of international law as part of the structure of the European Stability Mechanism (ESM). It expounds the legal framework applying to the two institutions in the ESM by analysing the currently applicable legislation as well as recent case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) (Ledra and Mallis). It argues that the applicable legal framework remains underdeveloped and unclear, especially with regard to the obligations incumbent on the ECB in the ESM, which have not yet been examined by the EU courts. Exploring the main challenges resulting from the ambiguity of the tasks and obligations conferred on the two EU institutions in the ESM, the article argues that all EU law applies in principle to the activities of the EU institutions in the ESM. It then shifts the focus to political and legal accountability, the emphasis being on direct and indirect actions before the CJEU, including the vexed issue of liability of the EU institutions for damages caused by their actions in the ESM. The article concludes with a forward-looking assessment in light of the Five Presidents’ Report on Completing the EMU, which stipulates that the governance of the ESM should be integrated within the framework of EU law. The article questions whether a future incorporation of the ESM’s governance in EU law could address any of the challenges resulting from the current uncertainty about the role and potential liability of the Commission and the ECB for their actions in the ESM, and makes a number of recommendations as to how the ESM should be incorporated into EU law.
欧盟委员会和欧洲央行在欧洲稳定机制中扮演什么角色?
本文考察了欧盟委员会和欧洲中央银行(ECB)在经济和货币联盟(EMU)背景下的角色转变,从欧盟制度框架内的机构,到作为欧洲稳定机制(ESM)结构的一部分,在国际法领域承担新任务的行动者。它通过分析目前适用的立法以及欧盟法院(Ledra和Mallis)最近的判例法,阐述了适用于ESM中两个机构的法律框架。它认为,适用的法律框架仍然不发达和不明确,特别是关于欧洲央行在ESM中的义务,这些义务尚未得到欧盟法院的审查。本文探讨了在ESM中赋予两个欧盟机构的任务和义务的模糊性所带来的主要挑战,认为所有欧盟法律原则上都适用于欧盟机构在ESM中的活动。然后,它将焦点转移到政治和法律责任上,重点放在欧洲法院的直接和间接诉讼上,包括欧盟机构对其在ESM中的行为造成的损害的责任这一棘手问题。文章最后根据五国总统关于完成欧洲货币联盟的报告进行了前瞻性评估,该报告规定欧洲货币联盟的治理应纳入欧盟法律框架。文章质疑未来将ESM的治理纳入欧盟法律是否可以解决当前欧盟委员会和欧洲央行在ESM中的作用和潜在责任的不确定性所带来的任何挑战,并就如何将ESM纳入欧盟法律提出了一些建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信