The Health Economic-Industrial Complex (HEIC) and a New Public Health Perspective

J. G. Temporão, C. Gadelha
{"title":"The Health Economic-Industrial Complex (HEIC) and a New Public Health Perspective","authors":"J. G. Temporão, C. Gadelha","doi":"10.1093/acrefore/9780190632366.013.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The health economic-industrial complex concept was developed in Brazil in the early 2000s, integrating a structuralist view of the political economy with a public health vision. This perspective advances, in relation to sectoral approaches in health industries and services, toward a systemic approach to the productive environment, focusing on the dimensions of innovation and universal access to health. Health production is seen in an interdependent way, recognizing that the different industrial and service sectors have strong articulations that need to be integrated. The shift toward a universal care model that focuses on human and social needs requires a productive knowledge base that favors promotion, prevention, and local and permanent healthcare, requiring new productive patterns of goods and services and innovation. Therefore, these dimensions are not conceptually apart from each other, considering an analytical and political point of view.\n The production, care, and sustainability of universal health systems are understood in an integrated and systemic way. Within this vision, a cognitive leap is presented in relation to the traditional health economics, linked to the allocation of scarce resources, to a vision of health political economy that favors the development, expansion, and transformation of the health system and its economic and industrial base. Health is conceived as a moral right of citizenship and a vital space for the development of countries (and for global health), generating social inclusion, equity, innovation, and a possibility for the cooperation between countries and peoples.\n The Brazilian experience is an exemplary case of association between the development of theoretical conception and its implementation in the national health policy that led to the link between economic development policies and social policies. It was possible to advance both conceptually in terms of a vision of health and social well-being and in contributing to a new paradigm of public policies. This perspective allowed the guidance of guide industrial development and services toward the human needs and universal health systems, considering the challenges brought by the context of an ongoing fourth technological revolution.","PeriodicalId":342682,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Global Public Health","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Global Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190632366.013.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The health economic-industrial complex concept was developed in Brazil in the early 2000s, integrating a structuralist view of the political economy with a public health vision. This perspective advances, in relation to sectoral approaches in health industries and services, toward a systemic approach to the productive environment, focusing on the dimensions of innovation and universal access to health. Health production is seen in an interdependent way, recognizing that the different industrial and service sectors have strong articulations that need to be integrated. The shift toward a universal care model that focuses on human and social needs requires a productive knowledge base that favors promotion, prevention, and local and permanent healthcare, requiring new productive patterns of goods and services and innovation. Therefore, these dimensions are not conceptually apart from each other, considering an analytical and political point of view. The production, care, and sustainability of universal health systems are understood in an integrated and systemic way. Within this vision, a cognitive leap is presented in relation to the traditional health economics, linked to the allocation of scarce resources, to a vision of health political economy that favors the development, expansion, and transformation of the health system and its economic and industrial base. Health is conceived as a moral right of citizenship and a vital space for the development of countries (and for global health), generating social inclusion, equity, innovation, and a possibility for the cooperation between countries and peoples. The Brazilian experience is an exemplary case of association between the development of theoretical conception and its implementation in the national health policy that led to the link between economic development policies and social policies. It was possible to advance both conceptually in terms of a vision of health and social well-being and in contributing to a new paradigm of public policies. This perspective allowed the guidance of guide industrial development and services toward the human needs and universal health systems, considering the challenges brought by the context of an ongoing fourth technological revolution.
健康经济-产业综合体(HEIC)与公共卫生新视角
健康经济-工业综合体概念于21世纪初在巴西发展起来,将政治经济学的结构主义观点与公共卫生愿景相结合。就卫生产业和服务的部门办法而言,这一观点促进了对生产环境采取系统办法,侧重于创新和普遍获得保健的各个方面。卫生生产是相互依存的,认识到不同的工业和服务部门有很强的联系,需要加以整合。向以人类和社会需求为重点的全民保健模式的转变,需要一个有利于促进、预防以及地方和永久性卫生保健的生产性知识库,需要新的商品和服务生产模式以及创新。因此,从分析和政治的角度考虑,这些方面在概念上并不是彼此分开的。以综合和系统的方式了解全民卫生系统的生产、护理和可持续性。在这一愿景中,与传统卫生经济学(与稀缺资源的分配有关)以及有利于卫生系统及其经济和工业基础的发展、扩张和转型的卫生政治经济学愿景相关的认知出现了飞跃。健康被视为公民的一项道德权利,是各国(和全球卫生)发展的重要空间,促进社会包容、公平、创新,并为国家和人民之间的合作提供了可能性。巴西的经验是理论概念的发展与其在国家卫生政策中的执行之间联系的一个典范,这种联系导致了经济发展政策与社会政策之间的联系。有可能在概念上推进健康和社会福利的愿景,并促进公共政策的新范式。考虑到正在进行的第四次技术革命带来的挑战,这一观点使指导工业发展和服务朝着人类需求和全民卫生系统的方向发展成为可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信