{"title":"[Tunnel preparations. Traditional and alternative methods].","authors":"L Hasselrot","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Alternative, conservative techniques for treatment of initial approximal carious lesions in the premolar-molar region are described. Beside the \"traditional\" tunnel preparation a modified technique is described, in which the proximal enamel wall is left untouched, unless the carious lesion has perforated the amelodentinal junction. The internal Class I-cavity is filled with a radiopaque glass ionomer cement and a composite resin. During 2 years 282 approximal surfaces have been treated and in the 1-year follow-up study is shown that both techniques have sufficient success rate to encourage further use and study. The advantages of these techniques compared to Class II-restorations with amalgam or composite resins are discussed and judged as considerable.</p>","PeriodicalId":76578,"journal":{"name":"Tandlakartidningen","volume":"82 21","pages":"1114-26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tandlakartidningen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Alternative, conservative techniques for treatment of initial approximal carious lesions in the premolar-molar region are described. Beside the "traditional" tunnel preparation a modified technique is described, in which the proximal enamel wall is left untouched, unless the carious lesion has perforated the amelodentinal junction. The internal Class I-cavity is filled with a radiopaque glass ionomer cement and a composite resin. During 2 years 282 approximal surfaces have been treated and in the 1-year follow-up study is shown that both techniques have sufficient success rate to encourage further use and study. The advantages of these techniques compared to Class II-restorations with amalgam or composite resins are discussed and judged as considerable.