COMPARISON BETWEEN EX-PRESS MINI SHUNT IMPLANTATION AND DEEP SCLEROTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH PRIMARY OPEN-ANGLE GLAUCOMA (POAG)

Khallaf, H., A. M., El-moddather, M., G. A.
{"title":"COMPARISON BETWEEN EX-PRESS MINI SHUNT IMPLANTATION AND DEEP SCLEROTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH PRIMARY OPEN-ANGLE GLAUCOMA (POAG)","authors":"Khallaf, H., A. M., El-moddather, M., G. A.","doi":"10.21608/ejco.2021.215520","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: is to compare the success rate of Ex-PRESS implantation vs deep sclerotomy (DS) in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Patients and methods: This is a randomized prospective interventional comparative study between Ex-PRESS and DS maneuvers in patients with POAG. The study included 47patients (50 eyes) with POAG. The patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 included 25 patients (25 eyes) who underwent Ex-PRESS device implantation. Group 2 included 22 patients (25 eyes) who underwent DS. All included patients underwent a thorough ophthalmic examination. At the end of the 1 st year postoperatively, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) [logMAR], intraocular pressure (IOP), number of anti-glaucoma medications in use were obtained. Results: In group 1, complete success rate was 76%, qualified success rate was 20% and failure rate 4% occurred in 1 eye of patients which needed explantation of the device and another glaucoma filtering surgery due to device-corneal touch. Meanwhile in group 2, complete success rate was36% and qualified success rate was 64% without any recorded failure in this group (Both Ps<0.01) in both groups. Conclusion: favorable effects on IOP and the need for IOPlowering medications in both Ex-PRESS and DS groups. However, in DS group, higher preoperative IOP is associated with increased failure rate necessitating more postoperative IOP adjustments than Ex-PRESS group.","PeriodicalId":267572,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology","volume":"45 12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Clinical Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ejco.2021.215520","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: is to compare the success rate of Ex-PRESS implantation vs deep sclerotomy (DS) in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Patients and methods: This is a randomized prospective interventional comparative study between Ex-PRESS and DS maneuvers in patients with POAG. The study included 47patients (50 eyes) with POAG. The patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 included 25 patients (25 eyes) who underwent Ex-PRESS device implantation. Group 2 included 22 patients (25 eyes) who underwent DS. All included patients underwent a thorough ophthalmic examination. At the end of the 1 st year postoperatively, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) [logMAR], intraocular pressure (IOP), number of anti-glaucoma medications in use were obtained. Results: In group 1, complete success rate was 76%, qualified success rate was 20% and failure rate 4% occurred in 1 eye of patients which needed explantation of the device and another glaucoma filtering surgery due to device-corneal touch. Meanwhile in group 2, complete success rate was36% and qualified success rate was 64% without any recorded failure in this group (Both Ps<0.01) in both groups. Conclusion: favorable effects on IOP and the need for IOPlowering medications in both Ex-PRESS and DS groups. However, in DS group, higher preoperative IOP is associated with increased failure rate necessitating more postoperative IOP adjustments than Ex-PRESS group.
原发性开角型青光眼(poag)微创分流器植入术与深度巩膜切开术的比较
目的:比较Ex-PRESS植入术与深度巩膜切开术治疗原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)的成功率。患者和方法:这是一项针对POAG患者的Ex-PRESS和DS操作的随机前瞻性介入比较研究。该研究包括47例POAG患者(50只眼)。患者被分为两组。第一组25例(25眼)行Ex-PRESS植入术。第二组22例(25眼)行退行性椎体滑移。所有患者均接受了彻底的眼科检查。术后1年末,获得最佳矫正视力(BCVA) [logMAR]、眼压(IOP)、使用抗青光眼药物数量。结果:1组患者有1只眼因器械与角膜接触需摘除青光眼滤过手术,完全成功率为76%,合格率为20%,失败率为4%。2组完全成功率为36%,合格成功率为64%,无失败记录(p <0.01)。结论:Ex-PRESS组和DS组对IOP均有良好的影响,需要使用IOP药物。然而,与Ex-PRESS组相比,DS组术前IOP升高与术后故障率增加相关,需要进行更多的IOP调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信