{"title":"PIONEERING IN NEO-LATIN DRAMA","authors":"Louis A. Schuster","doi":"10.1086/renadramreporese.6.43264645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The preoccupation of scholars with the vernacular literatures of the Renaissance during the past century has not only relegated Neo-Latin literature to a position of comparative oblivioni it has tended to convince us that the vast corpus of Renaissance works written in Latin does not even existo No thoroughgoing history of Renaissance Latin literature has yet been attempted 9 simply because such an undertaking would prove well nigh limitless 0 As Father Ong has remarka d 9 it would covar all Europe and America and weave in and out of every vernacular literature from Portuguese to Hungarian, from Italian to Icelandic, and be simply the history of the Western mind0 It should be noted, however, that at the 1952 meeting of the Modern Language Association a cooperative history of modern Latin literature ( liļ 00-1600 ), under the general editorship of James R, Naidens was assigned to thirty-two scholars, each responsible for one aspect of the history. Some of these studies have already appeared. But the projectors of the venture, I feel sure, were under no illusion that the finished work would be more than a survey.","PeriodicalId":444319,"journal":{"name":"Renaissance Drama, a Report on Research Opportunities","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1963-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renaissance Drama, a Report on Research Opportunities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/renadramreporese.6.43264645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The preoccupation of scholars with the vernacular literatures of the Renaissance during the past century has not only relegated Neo-Latin literature to a position of comparative oblivioni it has tended to convince us that the vast corpus of Renaissance works written in Latin does not even existo No thoroughgoing history of Renaissance Latin literature has yet been attempted 9 simply because such an undertaking would prove well nigh limitless 0 As Father Ong has remarka d 9 it would covar all Europe and America and weave in and out of every vernacular literature from Portuguese to Hungarian, from Italian to Icelandic, and be simply the history of the Western mind0 It should be noted, however, that at the 1952 meeting of the Modern Language Association a cooperative history of modern Latin literature ( liļ 00-1600 ), under the general editorship of James R, Naidens was assigned to thirty-two scholars, each responsible for one aspect of the history. Some of these studies have already appeared. But the projectors of the venture, I feel sure, were under no illusion that the finished work would be more than a survey.
学者的关注与文艺复兴的乡土文学在过去世纪不仅降级新拉丁语文学的比较oblivioni倾向于说服我们,文艺复兴时期的作品的巨大的语料库拉丁甚至不existo彻底的文艺复兴时期的拉丁语文学史尚未尝试9因为这样的事业将证明几乎无限的0为父亲Ong remarka d 9将柯伐合金从葡萄牙语到匈牙利语,从意大利语到冰岛语,在每一种方言文学中都有穿插,并成为西方思想史。然而,应该指出的是,在1952年现代语言协会的会议上,在詹姆斯·R·奈登的总编辑下,现代拉丁文学史的合作被分配给32位学者,每人负责历史的一个方面。其中一些研究已经出现。但是,我敢肯定,这个项目的出映人并没有幻想完成的工作将不仅仅是一项调查。