Practices related to internal and cross-border congestion management

K. Purchała, M. Shinkai, F. Regairaz
{"title":"Practices related to internal and cross-border congestion management","authors":"K. Purchała, M. Shinkai, F. Regairaz","doi":"10.1109/CIGRE.2005.1532719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is based on the survey conducted by the Working Group C5-4 on congestion management. First it describes various market conditions and institutional arrangements in the 18 countries participating in the survey. Then, internal and cross-border congestion management in these countries are presented. The interaction with the electricity market is discussed, considering allocation of transmission capacity, market schedule, congestion management tools and payment for the costs incurred. The survey shows that there is a tendency towards the use of market-based methods. Coordinated market-based measures seem to be the most effective. For the time being however, few systems have experiences with it","PeriodicalId":414346,"journal":{"name":"International Symposium CIGRE/IEEE PES, 2005.","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Symposium CIGRE/IEEE PES, 2005.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIGRE.2005.1532719","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This paper is based on the survey conducted by the Working Group C5-4 on congestion management. First it describes various market conditions and institutional arrangements in the 18 countries participating in the survey. Then, internal and cross-border congestion management in these countries are presented. The interaction with the electricity market is discussed, considering allocation of transmission capacity, market schedule, congestion management tools and payment for the costs incurred. The survey shows that there is a tendency towards the use of market-based methods. Coordinated market-based measures seem to be the most effective. For the time being however, few systems have experiences with it
与内部和跨境拥堵管理有关的实践
本文是根据交通挤塞管理工作小组C5-4所进行的调查。首先,它描述了参与调查的18个国家的各种市场条件和制度安排。然后,介绍了这些国家的内部和跨境拥堵管理。讨论了与电力市场的互动,考虑了传输容量的分配,市场计划,拥塞管理工具和支付所产生的成本。调查显示,有一种使用基于市场的方法的趋势。以市场为基础的协调措施似乎是最有效的。然而目前,很少有系统有过这样的经验
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信