{"title":"Der Fall des Philosophen","authors":"H. Gekle","doi":"10.5771/9783465143642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The history of mental development on the one and the history of his writings on the other hand form the two separate but essentially intertwined strands of an archeology of Ernst Bloch´s thought undertaken in this book. Bloch as a philosopher is peculiar in that his initial access to thought rose from the depths of early, painful experience. To give expression to this experience, he not only needed to develop new categories, but first and foremost had to find words for it: the experience of the uncanny and the abysmal, of which he tells in Spuren, is on the level of philosophical theory juxtaposed by the “Dunkel des gerade gelebten Augenblicks” (darkness of the moment just lived) and his discovery of a “Noch-nicht-Bewusstes” (not-yet-conscious), thus metaphysically undermining the classical Oedipus complex in the succession of Freud. In this book, psyche, work and the history of the 20th century appear concentrated in Ernst Bloch the philosopher and contemporary witness, who paid tribute to these supra-individual powers in his work as much as he hoped to transgress them.","PeriodicalId":391714,"journal":{"name":"Der Fall des Philosophen","volume":"89 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Der Fall des Philosophen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783465143642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The history of mental development on the one and the history of his writings on the other hand form the two separate but essentially intertwined strands of an archeology of Ernst Bloch´s thought undertaken in this book. Bloch as a philosopher is peculiar in that his initial access to thought rose from the depths of early, painful experience. To give expression to this experience, he not only needed to develop new categories, but first and foremost had to find words for it: the experience of the uncanny and the abysmal, of which he tells in Spuren, is on the level of philosophical theory juxtaposed by the “Dunkel des gerade gelebten Augenblicks” (darkness of the moment just lived) and his discovery of a “Noch-nicht-Bewusstes” (not-yet-conscious), thus metaphysically undermining the classical Oedipus complex in the succession of Freud. In this book, psyche, work and the history of the 20th century appear concentrated in Ernst Bloch the philosopher and contemporary witness, who paid tribute to these supra-individual powers in his work as much as he hoped to transgress them.
一方面是精神发展的历史,另一方面是他的著作的历史,形成了恩斯特·布洛赫在这本书中所承担的思想考古学的两个独立但本质上交织在一起的线索。作为一名哲学家,布洛赫的独特之处在于,他最初对思想的接触来自于早年痛苦经历的深处。为了表达这种体验,他不仅需要开发新的分类,而且首先需要找到合适的词汇:他在《斯普伦》中讲述的神秘和深渊的经历,是在哲学理论的层面上,与“刚刚生活的黑暗”(Dunkel des gerade gelebten Augenblicks)和他对“noch - night - bewusstes”(未意识)的发现并列,从而在形而上学上破坏了弗洛伊德继承的经典俄狄浦斯情结。在这本书中,精神、工作和20世纪的历史都集中在哲学家和当代见证者恩斯特·布洛赫(Ernst Bloch)身上,他在自己的作品中向这些超个人的力量致敬,就像他希望超越它们一样。