When the desert floods: Military relief work, attributing clean-up responsibility, and future helping intentions following the Katherine flood

Tracey Tann
{"title":"When the desert floods: Military relief work, attributing clean-up responsibility, and future helping intentions following the Katherine flood","authors":"Tracey Tann","doi":"10.1017/S0257543400000638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Attribution theory has seldom been applied to assess the impact of community disaster relief work on military personnel, despite a clear prediction from Actor-Observer theory that direct experience of the community's environment will increase helpers' motivation to help in future crises. In the wake of the Northern Territory's Katherine River Flood in January 1998, 31 Royal Australian Army relief workers and 21 army personnel not posted to relief work attributed responsibility for cleaning-up homes, shops and businesses in the recently flood-affected South Pacific communities of Katherine, Townsville, and the Cook Islands. Direct experience of disaster relief work was not associated with any systematic differences in dispositional or situational attributions, although the latter were generally linked to intention to help in future crises. Occasional rumours of negative critical incidents with the local community, although rare considering the magnitude of the relief effort, may have partly coloured the experience of seeing the tragedy first-hand, which would suggest a need to research the Negative Information Bias and the psychology of rumour in future disaster recovery projects.","PeriodicalId":351734,"journal":{"name":"South Pacific Journal of Psychology","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Pacific Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0257543400000638","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Attribution theory has seldom been applied to assess the impact of community disaster relief work on military personnel, despite a clear prediction from Actor-Observer theory that direct experience of the community's environment will increase helpers' motivation to help in future crises. In the wake of the Northern Territory's Katherine River Flood in January 1998, 31 Royal Australian Army relief workers and 21 army personnel not posted to relief work attributed responsibility for cleaning-up homes, shops and businesses in the recently flood-affected South Pacific communities of Katherine, Townsville, and the Cook Islands. Direct experience of disaster relief work was not associated with any systematic differences in dispositional or situational attributions, although the latter were generally linked to intention to help in future crises. Occasional rumours of negative critical incidents with the local community, although rare considering the magnitude of the relief effort, may have partly coloured the experience of seeing the tragedy first-hand, which would suggest a need to research the Negative Information Bias and the psychology of rumour in future disaster recovery projects.
当沙漠洪水:军事救援工作,归因清理责任,以及凯瑟琳洪水后未来的帮助意图
归因理论很少被用于评估社区救灾工作对军事人员的影响,尽管行动者-观察者理论明确预测,对社区环境的直接体验会增加帮助者在未来危机中提供帮助的动机。在1998年1月北领地凯瑟琳河洪水之后,31名澳大利亚皇家陆军救援人员和21名未被派往救援工作的陆军人员负责清理最近受洪水影响的凯瑟琳、汤斯维尔和库克群岛南太平洋社区的房屋、商店和企业。救灾工作的直接经历与性格或情境归因的任何系统差异无关,尽管后者通常与在未来危机中提供帮助的意图有关。与当地社区偶尔发生的负面关键事件的谣言,虽然考虑到救援工作的规模很少,但可能在一定程度上影响了亲眼目睹悲剧的经历,这表明有必要研究负面信息偏见和谣言心理在未来的灾难恢复项目中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信