A Comparison of Deep Learning Methods for Semantic Segmentation of Coral Reef Survey Images

A. King, S. Bhandarkar, B. Hopkinson
{"title":"A Comparison of Deep Learning Methods for Semantic Segmentation of Coral Reef Survey Images","authors":"A. King, S. Bhandarkar, B. Hopkinson","doi":"10.1109/CVPRW.2018.00188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two major deep learning methods for semantic segmentation, i.e., patch-based convolutional neural network (CNN) approaches and fully convolutional neural network (FCNN) models, are studied in the context of classification of regions in underwater images of coral reef ecosystems into biologically meaningful categories. For the patch-based CNN approaches, we use image data extracted from underwater video accompanied by individual point-wise ground truth annotations. We show that patch-based CNN methods can outperform a previously proposed approach that uses support vector machine (SVM)-based classifiers in conjunction with texture-based features. We compare the results of five different CNN architectures in our formulation of patch-based CNN methods. The Resnet152 CNN architecture is observed to perform the best on our annotated dataset of underwater coral reef images. We also examine and compare the results of four different FCNN models for semantic segmentation of coral reef images. We develop a tool for fast generation of segmentation maps to serve as ground truth segmentations for our FCNN models. The FCNN architecture Deeplab v2 is observed to yield the best results for semantic segmentation of underwater coral reef images.","PeriodicalId":150600,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"46","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPRW.2018.00188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 46

Abstract

Two major deep learning methods for semantic segmentation, i.e., patch-based convolutional neural network (CNN) approaches and fully convolutional neural network (FCNN) models, are studied in the context of classification of regions in underwater images of coral reef ecosystems into biologically meaningful categories. For the patch-based CNN approaches, we use image data extracted from underwater video accompanied by individual point-wise ground truth annotations. We show that patch-based CNN methods can outperform a previously proposed approach that uses support vector machine (SVM)-based classifiers in conjunction with texture-based features. We compare the results of five different CNN architectures in our formulation of patch-based CNN methods. The Resnet152 CNN architecture is observed to perform the best on our annotated dataset of underwater coral reef images. We also examine and compare the results of four different FCNN models for semantic segmentation of coral reef images. We develop a tool for fast generation of segmentation maps to serve as ground truth segmentations for our FCNN models. The FCNN architecture Deeplab v2 is observed to yield the best results for semantic segmentation of underwater coral reef images.
珊瑚礁测量图像语义分割的深度学习方法比较
研究了基于patch的卷积神经网络(CNN)方法和全卷积神经网络(FCNN)模型两种主要的语义分割深度学习方法,并将珊瑚礁生态系统水下图像中的区域划分为具有生物学意义的类别。对于基于patch的CNN方法,我们使用从水下视频中提取的图像数据以及单个逐点的地面真值注释。我们表明,基于补丁的CNN方法可以优于先前提出的使用基于支持向量机(SVM)的分类器与基于纹理的特征相结合的方法。在我们的基于patch的CNN方法的表述中,我们比较了五种不同CNN架构的结果。我们观察到Resnet152 CNN架构在我们的水下珊瑚礁图像注释数据集上表现最好。我们还研究并比较了四种不同的FCNN模型对珊瑚礁图像进行语义分割的结果。我们开发了一个快速生成分割图的工具,作为我们的FCNN模型的地面真值分割。FCNN架构Deeplab v2对水下珊瑚礁图像的语义分割效果最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信