Review on the Major Antimicrobial Resistance Bacterial Pathogen of Poultry

B. Regassa
{"title":"Review on the Major Antimicrobial Resistance Bacterial Pathogen of Poultry","authors":"B. Regassa","doi":"10.19080/JDVS.2019.12.555842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global health threat, and antimicrobial usage and AMR in animal production is one of its contributing sources. Poultry flocks are often raised under intensive conditions using large amounts of antimicrobials to prevent and to treat disease, as well as for growth promotion. Antimicrobial resistant of poultry pathogens may result in treatment failure, leading to economic losses, but also be a source of resistant bacteria/genes (including zoonotic bacteria) that may represent a risk to human health. Here I reviewed data on AMR in poultry pathogens, including avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC), Salmonella Pullorum/Gallinarum, Pasteurellamultocida, Clostridiumperfringens, Mycoplasma spp, Avibacteriumparagallinarum, Gallibacteriumanatis, Ornitobacteriumrhinotracheale (ORT) and Bordetella avium. A number of studies have demonstrated increases in resistance over time for S. Pullorum/Gallinarum, M. gallisepticum, and G. anatis. Among Enterobacteriaeae, APEC isolates displayed considerably higher levels of AMR compared with S. Pullorum/Gallinarum, with prevalence of resistance over >80% for ampicillin, amoxicillin, tetracycline across studies. Among the Gram-negative, non-Enterobacteriaceae pathogens, ORT had the highest levels of phenotypic resistance with median levels of AMR against co-trimoxazole, enrofloxacin, gentamicin, amoxicillin, and ceftiofur all exceeding 50%. In contrast, levels of resistance among P. multocida isolates were less than 20% for all antimicrobials. AMR poses considerable health hazards to the consumers unless prudent antimicrobial usage, adequate heat treatment, improvement of standards of hygiene and development and enforcement of suitable legislation, which safeguard consumers, are urgently instituted.","PeriodicalId":403730,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dairy & Veterinary Sciences","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dairy & Veterinary Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19080/JDVS.2019.12.555842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global health threat, and antimicrobial usage and AMR in animal production is one of its contributing sources. Poultry flocks are often raised under intensive conditions using large amounts of antimicrobials to prevent and to treat disease, as well as for growth promotion. Antimicrobial resistant of poultry pathogens may result in treatment failure, leading to economic losses, but also be a source of resistant bacteria/genes (including zoonotic bacteria) that may represent a risk to human health. Here I reviewed data on AMR in poultry pathogens, including avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC), Salmonella Pullorum/Gallinarum, Pasteurellamultocida, Clostridiumperfringens, Mycoplasma spp, Avibacteriumparagallinarum, Gallibacteriumanatis, Ornitobacteriumrhinotracheale (ORT) and Bordetella avium. A number of studies have demonstrated increases in resistance over time for S. Pullorum/Gallinarum, M. gallisepticum, and G. anatis. Among Enterobacteriaeae, APEC isolates displayed considerably higher levels of AMR compared with S. Pullorum/Gallinarum, with prevalence of resistance over >80% for ampicillin, amoxicillin, tetracycline across studies. Among the Gram-negative, non-Enterobacteriaceae pathogens, ORT had the highest levels of phenotypic resistance with median levels of AMR against co-trimoxazole, enrofloxacin, gentamicin, amoxicillin, and ceftiofur all exceeding 50%. In contrast, levels of resistance among P. multocida isolates were less than 20% for all antimicrobials. AMR poses considerable health hazards to the consumers unless prudent antimicrobial usage, adequate heat treatment, improvement of standards of hygiene and development and enforcement of suitable legislation, which safeguard consumers, are urgently instituted.
家禽主要耐药病原菌研究进展
抗菌素耐药性(AMR)是一个全球性的健康威胁,动物生产中的抗菌素使用和AMR是其促成来源之一。禽群通常在集约化条件下饲养,使用大量抗菌素来预防和治疗疾病以及促进生长。家禽病原体的抗微生物药物耐药性可能导致治疗失败,导致经济损失,但也可能成为耐药细菌/基因(包括人畜共患细菌)的来源,可能对人类健康构成风险。在这里,我回顾了家禽病原体中抗生素耐药性的数据,包括禽致病性大肠杆菌(APEC)、鸡痢沙门氏菌、巴氏杆菌、产气荚膜梭菌、支原体、副allinarum avibacteriumgallibacteriummanatis、禽鼻气管鸟杆菌(Ornitobacteriumrhinotracheale, ORT)和禽博德氏菌。许多研究表明,随着时间的推移,鸡芽孢杆菌、鸡芽孢杆菌和鸡芽孢杆菌的耐药性会增加。在肠杆菌科中,与S. Pullorum/Gallinarum相比,APEC分离株显示出相当高的AMR水平,研究中对氨苄西林、阿莫西林和四环素的耐药率超过80%。在革兰氏阴性的非肠杆菌科病原菌中,ORT的表型耐药水平最高,对复方新诺明、恩诺沙星、庆大霉素、阿莫西林和头孢替福的中位耐药水平均超过50%。相比之下,多杀假单胞菌对所有抗菌素的耐药水平均低于20%。抗菌素耐药性对消费者构成相当大的健康危害,除非紧急制定审慎的抗菌素使用、适当的热处理、提高卫生标准以及制定和执行保护消费者的适当立法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信