OLTP on a server-grade ARM: power, throughput and latency comparison

Utku Sirin, Raja Appuswamy, A. Ailamaki
{"title":"OLTP on a server-grade ARM: power, throughput and latency comparison","authors":"Utku Sirin, Raja Appuswamy, A. Ailamaki","doi":"10.1145/2933349.2933359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although scaling out of low-power cores is an alternative to power-hungry Intel Xeon processors for reducing the power overheads, they have proven inadequate for complex, non-parallelizable workloads. On the other hand, by the introduction of the 64-bit ARMv8 architecture, traditionally low power ARM processors have become powerful enough to run computationally intensive server-class applications.\n In this study, we compare a high-performance Intel x86 processor with a commercial implementation of the ARM Cortex-A57. We measure the power used, throughput delivered and latency quantified when running OLTP workloads. Our results show that the ARM processor consumes 3 to 15 times less power than the x86, while penalizing OLTP throughput by a much lower factor (1.7 to 3). As a result, the significant power savings deliver up to 9 times higher energy efficiency. The x86's heavily optimized power-hungry micro-architectural structures contribute to throughput only marginally. As a result, the x86 wastes power when utilization is low, while lightweight ARM processor consumes only as much power as it is utilized, achieving energy proportionality. On the other hand, ARM's quantified latency can be up to 11x higher than x86 towards to the tail of latency distribution, making x86 more suitable for certain type of service-level agreements.","PeriodicalId":298901,"journal":{"name":"International Workshop on Data Management on New Hardware","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Workshop on Data Management on New Hardware","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2933349.2933359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Although scaling out of low-power cores is an alternative to power-hungry Intel Xeon processors for reducing the power overheads, they have proven inadequate for complex, non-parallelizable workloads. On the other hand, by the introduction of the 64-bit ARMv8 architecture, traditionally low power ARM processors have become powerful enough to run computationally intensive server-class applications. In this study, we compare a high-performance Intel x86 processor with a commercial implementation of the ARM Cortex-A57. We measure the power used, throughput delivered and latency quantified when running OLTP workloads. Our results show that the ARM processor consumes 3 to 15 times less power than the x86, while penalizing OLTP throughput by a much lower factor (1.7 to 3). As a result, the significant power savings deliver up to 9 times higher energy efficiency. The x86's heavily optimized power-hungry micro-architectural structures contribute to throughput only marginally. As a result, the x86 wastes power when utilization is low, while lightweight ARM processor consumes only as much power as it is utilized, achieving energy proportionality. On the other hand, ARM's quantified latency can be up to 11x higher than x86 towards to the tail of latency distribution, making x86 more suitable for certain type of service-level agreements.
服务器级ARM上的OLTP:功率、吞吐量和延迟比较
尽管在低功耗内核之外扩展是降低功耗的英特尔至强处理器的一种替代方案,但它们已被证明不适用于复杂的、不可并行的工作负载。另一方面,由于64位ARMv8架构的引入,传统的低功耗ARM处理器已经变得足够强大,可以运行计算密集型的服务器类应用程序。在本研究中,我们比较了高性能英特尔x86处理器与ARM Cortex-A57的商业实现。我们测量运行OLTP工作负载时使用的功率、交付的吞吐量和量化的延迟。我们的结果表明,ARM处理器消耗的功率比x86少3到15倍,而对OLTP吞吐量的影响要低得多(1.7到3)。因此,显著的功率节省提供了高达9倍的能源效率。x86高度优化的耗电微架构结构对吞吐量的贡献微乎其微。因此,x86在利用率较低时浪费电力,而轻量级的ARM处理器只消耗与被利用的相同的电力,实现了能量比例。另一方面,在延迟分布的尾部,ARM的量化延迟可以比x86高11倍,这使得x86更适合某些类型的服务级别协议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信