Investigation into Korean School Milk Program Management and Dietitians' Perception of School Milk Program Improvement

Yung Eun Lee, Yeonseong Song, Min-Sun Jeon
{"title":"Investigation into Korean School Milk Program Management and Dietitians' Perception of School Milk Program Improvement","authors":"Yung Eun Lee, Yeonseong Song, Min-Sun Jeon","doi":"10.14373/JKDA.2015.21.4.291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was aimed to investigate management conditions and dietitians' perception for improvement of school milk programs. Using an online sampling method, collected data from 1,723 dietitians nationwide were analyzed. The results show that 44.4% of respondents carried out the cyclic school milk program, providing various types of dairy products either weekly or monthly. Further, 80.3% of respondents answered that preference survey results were a determining factor in their choice of school milk provider, and 55.9% said that a school steering committee made the decision on relevant facts of the school milk program. For diversification of school milk type, 60.5% of respondents wanted to maintain the current system, and 39.5% answered that milk type needed to be diversified. The respondents preferred fermented milk products, functional milk, and processed milk, in order, if school milk type is diversified. To improve perception and knowledge about milk, 66.0% of respondents thought that nutrition education by a nutrition teacher would be the most effective, and parent's letters or a nutrition newsletter would be helpful. More than half of respondents (55.0%) disagreed with a merged program for school foodservice and milk.","PeriodicalId":438121,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Korean Dietetic Association","volume":"134 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Korean Dietetic Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14373/JKDA.2015.21.4.291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study was aimed to investigate management conditions and dietitians' perception for improvement of school milk programs. Using an online sampling method, collected data from 1,723 dietitians nationwide were analyzed. The results show that 44.4% of respondents carried out the cyclic school milk program, providing various types of dairy products either weekly or monthly. Further, 80.3% of respondents answered that preference survey results were a determining factor in their choice of school milk provider, and 55.9% said that a school steering committee made the decision on relevant facts of the school milk program. For diversification of school milk type, 60.5% of respondents wanted to maintain the current system, and 39.5% answered that milk type needed to be diversified. The respondents preferred fermented milk products, functional milk, and processed milk, in order, if school milk type is diversified. To improve perception and knowledge about milk, 66.0% of respondents thought that nutrition education by a nutrition teacher would be the most effective, and parent's letters or a nutrition newsletter would be helpful. More than half of respondents (55.0%) disagreed with a merged program for school foodservice and milk.
韩国学校牛奶计划管理及营养学家对学校牛奶计划改善的看法调查
本研究旨在探讨管理条件和营养师对改善学校牛奶计划的看法。采用在线抽样方法,对全国1723名营养师收集的数据进行了分析。结果显示,44.4%的受访者实施了循环学校牛奶计划,每周或每月提供各种类型的乳制品。另外,80.3%的回答者回答说,在选择学校牛奶公司时,偏好调查结果是决定性因素,55.9%的回答者回答说,学校运营委员会根据学校牛奶项目的相关事实做出了决定。对于学校牛奶种类多样化,60.5%的受访者希望维持现有制度,39.5%的受访者认为牛奶种类需要多样化。如果学校的牛奶种类多样化,受访者更喜欢发酵乳制品、功能牛奶和加工牛奶。为了提高对牛奶的认知和知识,66.0%的受访者认为由营养老师进行营养教育是最有效的,家长来信或营养通讯也会有所帮助。超过一半的受访者(55.0%)不同意学校餐饮服务和牛奶的合并计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信