Investigating Functional Variation across Academic Disciplines: A Multidimensional Analysis of Research Articles

Uzmaima Qadir, Samina Ahmad, Fareeha Mastoor
{"title":"Investigating Functional Variation across Academic Disciplines: A Multidimensional Analysis of Research Articles","authors":"Uzmaima Qadir, Samina Ahmad, Fareeha Mastoor","doi":"10.32350/jcct.51.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current study aims to investigate the functional variation in academic writing across six major disciplines of sciences, namely biology, physics, and computer science and of social sciences, namely linguistics, sociology, and psychology research articles. Furthermore, the current study also compares the use of language in science and social sciences research articles (RAs). For this purpose, a corpus of 300 research articles from six sub-disciplines of science and social sciences journals was compiled to conduct the analysis. A Multidimensional Analysis Tagger using version 1.3.2 was selected to tag and evaluate the RAs corpus. The triangulation research method was deployed to analyze the data quantitatively and to interpret the results qualitatively. The findings indicate that there are functional differences in the language employed in academic disciplines, particularly in terms of being informational, non-narrative, and persuasive. Likewise, comparable outcomes were noticed in dimension 3. The findings indicate that there are functional differences in the language employed in academic disciplines, particularly in terms of being informational, non-narrative, and persuasive. Likewise, comparable outcomes were noticed in dimension 3. The results may be helpful for the researchers, students of different disciplines, and teachers to spot trends across various sub-disciplines.","PeriodicalId":257118,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication and Cultural Trends","volume":"46 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communication and Cultural Trends","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32350/jcct.51.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current study aims to investigate the functional variation in academic writing across six major disciplines of sciences, namely biology, physics, and computer science and of social sciences, namely linguistics, sociology, and psychology research articles. Furthermore, the current study also compares the use of language in science and social sciences research articles (RAs). For this purpose, a corpus of 300 research articles from six sub-disciplines of science and social sciences journals was compiled to conduct the analysis. A Multidimensional Analysis Tagger using version 1.3.2 was selected to tag and evaluate the RAs corpus. The triangulation research method was deployed to analyze the data quantitatively and to interpret the results qualitatively. The findings indicate that there are functional differences in the language employed in academic disciplines, particularly in terms of being informational, non-narrative, and persuasive. Likewise, comparable outcomes were noticed in dimension 3. The findings indicate that there are functional differences in the language employed in academic disciplines, particularly in terms of being informational, non-narrative, and persuasive. Likewise, comparable outcomes were noticed in dimension 3. The results may be helpful for the researchers, students of different disciplines, and teachers to spot trends across various sub-disciplines.
研究跨学科的功能变异:研究论文的多维分析
本研究旨在调查六大科学学科,即生物学、物理学和计算机科学,以及社会科学,即语言学、社会学和心理学研究论文的学术写作功能差异。此外,本研究还比较了科学和社会科学研究论文中的语言使用情况。为此目的,汇编了来自科学和社会科学期刊六个分学科的300篇研究论文进行分析。使用1.3.2版本的多维分析标记器对RAs语料库进行标记和评估。采用三角测量研究方法对数据进行定量分析,并对结果进行定性解释。研究结果表明,学术学科中使用的语言存在功能差异,特别是在信息、非叙事和说服性方面。同样,在维度3中也注意到类似的结果。研究结果表明,学术学科中使用的语言存在功能差异,特别是在信息、非叙事和说服性方面。同样,在维度3中也注意到类似的结果。研究结果可能有助于研究人员、不同学科的学生和教师发现不同学科之间的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信