Separating Sheep from Goats

L. Francis, Greg Smith
{"title":"Separating Sheep from Goats","authors":"L. Francis, Greg Smith","doi":"10.1179/ate.9.2.gw21522035374468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Drawing on the theology of individual differences, Jungian psychological type theory and the SIFT method of biblical hermeneutics and liturgical preaching, this article outlines a method for constructing preaching workshops and documents the responses of 25 participants (11 Anglican clergywomen and 14 Anglican clergymen). The data support the view that naïve groups selected to separate out and to cluster together dominant sensing types, dominant intuitive types, dominant feeling types and dominant thinking types approach the passage in characteristically distinctive ways. The implication of these findings are discussed for developing the capacity of preachers to extend their preaching voice in light of insights offered by the SIFT approach.","PeriodicalId":224329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Adult Theological Education","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"51","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Adult Theological Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/ate.9.2.gw21522035374468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 51

Abstract

Abstract Drawing on the theology of individual differences, Jungian psychological type theory and the SIFT method of biblical hermeneutics and liturgical preaching, this article outlines a method for constructing preaching workshops and documents the responses of 25 participants (11 Anglican clergywomen and 14 Anglican clergymen). The data support the view that naïve groups selected to separate out and to cluster together dominant sensing types, dominant intuitive types, dominant feeling types and dominant thinking types approach the passage in characteristically distinctive ways. The implication of these findings are discussed for developing the capacity of preachers to extend their preaching voice in light of insights offered by the SIFT approach.
区分绵羊和山羊
摘要本文以个体差异神学、荣格心理类型理论、《圣经》诠释学和礼仪讲道的SIFT方法为基础,概述了一种构建讲道工作坊的方法,并记录了25名参与者(11名英国圣公会女牧师和14名英国圣公会男牧师)的反应。数据支持naïve群体选择分离和聚集主导感知类型,主导直觉类型,主导感觉类型和主导思维类型以独特的方式接近通道的观点。这些发现的含义进行了讨论,以发展传教士的能力,以扩大他们的讲道声音的见解提供了由SIFT方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信