Drilling on Publicly Owned Land

Eugene E. Dice
{"title":"Drilling on Publicly Owned Land","authors":"Eugene E. Dice","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2280519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article covers three recent court opinions dealing with drilling on state and federal land: two in Pennsylvania and one in California. In Minard Run Oil Co., v. U.S. Forest Service, a Third Circuit decision, private entities owned the subsurface rights, while the federal government owned and managed the surface rights. Belden & Blake v. DCNR, a PA Supreme Court decision, pitted the right of access by the owner of an oil and gas estate underlying a state park against the authority of a state agency to regulate and protect surface use. The article then contrasts those holdings with a recent California case, Center for Biological Diversity v. Bureau of Land Management, in which the government owned both the surface and the oil/gas in part of Central California’s Monterey Shale Formation.","PeriodicalId":388507,"journal":{"name":"Energy Law & Policy eJournal","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Law & Policy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2280519","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article covers three recent court opinions dealing with drilling on state and federal land: two in Pennsylvania and one in California. In Minard Run Oil Co., v. U.S. Forest Service, a Third Circuit decision, private entities owned the subsurface rights, while the federal government owned and managed the surface rights. Belden & Blake v. DCNR, a PA Supreme Court decision, pitted the right of access by the owner of an oil and gas estate underlying a state park against the authority of a state agency to regulate and protect surface use. The article then contrasts those holdings with a recent California case, Center for Biological Diversity v. Bureau of Land Management, in which the government owned both the surface and the oil/gas in part of Central California’s Monterey Shale Formation.
在公有土地上钻探
这篇文章涵盖了最近关于在州和联邦土地上钻探的三个法院意见:两个在宾夕法尼亚州,一个在加利福尼亚州。在第三巡回法院Minard Run Oil Co.诉美国林务局案中,私人实体拥有地下采矿权,而联邦政府拥有并管理地表采矿权。宾夕法尼亚州最高法院对Belden & Blake诉DCNR一案的判决,将州立公园地下油气产业所有者的使用权与国家机构监管和保护地面使用的权力对立起来。然后,文章将这些所有权与最近加州的一个案例进行了对比,即生物多样性中心诉土地管理局,在该案中,政府拥有加州中部蒙特利页岩地层的部分地表和石油/天然气。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信