Composition of proof-carrying architectures for cyber-physical systems

Ethan T. McGee, J. McGregor
{"title":"Composition of proof-carrying architectures for cyber-physical systems","authors":"Ethan T. McGee, J. McGregor","doi":"10.1145/2791060.2793676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Internet of Things (IoT) integrates a variety of cyber-physical systems; systems that are safety-critical and those that are not. Each of these systems is composed from assets that may have been intended to integrate successfully, but they have not necessarily been verified as doing so before the product is instantiated. Because assets are commonly shared among a family of cyber-physical products, Software Product Line (SPL) methods are crucial for the success of these systems if they are to be built economically without compromise to safety. Verification of the SPL architectures will help to ensure the safety of these systems is not compromised by any of the numerous assets that can be swapped in and out as new products are configured. The contribution of this work is an illustration of how software architectures might be annotated embedding verification information of the architecture supporting a compositional approach to verification. In order for verification of the SPL to be successful, the verification properties of one asset must seamlessly integrate with the verification properties of other assets in the SPL family. We introduce a method using two languages which are annexes of the Architecture Analysis & Description Language (AADL), AGREE and Resolute, that can be used to verify a variety of properties of the system described by the AADL model. Our technique allows for definition of constraints that can be proven as being met when the products are instantiated, however, the languages are not entirely sufficient. Our work shows both working cases and the limitations of verification of the architecture.","PeriodicalId":339158,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Software Product Line","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Software Product Line","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2791060.2793676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The Internet of Things (IoT) integrates a variety of cyber-physical systems; systems that are safety-critical and those that are not. Each of these systems is composed from assets that may have been intended to integrate successfully, but they have not necessarily been verified as doing so before the product is instantiated. Because assets are commonly shared among a family of cyber-physical products, Software Product Line (SPL) methods are crucial for the success of these systems if they are to be built economically without compromise to safety. Verification of the SPL architectures will help to ensure the safety of these systems is not compromised by any of the numerous assets that can be swapped in and out as new products are configured. The contribution of this work is an illustration of how software architectures might be annotated embedding verification information of the architecture supporting a compositional approach to verification. In order for verification of the SPL to be successful, the verification properties of one asset must seamlessly integrate with the verification properties of other assets in the SPL family. We introduce a method using two languages which are annexes of the Architecture Analysis & Description Language (AADL), AGREE and Resolute, that can be used to verify a variety of properties of the system described by the AADL model. Our technique allows for definition of constraints that can be proven as being met when the products are instantiated, however, the languages are not entirely sufficient. Our work shows both working cases and the limitations of verification of the architecture.
网络物理系统的证明承载体系结构的组成
物联网(IoT)集成了各种网络物理系统;对安全至关重要的系统和对安全无关的系统。这些系统中的每一个都是由资产组成的,这些资产可能已经被打算成功地集成,但是在产品实例化之前,它们没有必要被验证。由于资产通常在一系列网络物理产品之间共享,如果要在不损害安全的情况下经济地构建这些系统,软件产品线(SPL)方法对于这些系统的成功至关重要。对SPL体系结构的验证将有助于确保这些系统的安全性不会受到在配置新产品时可以交换进出的众多资产的影响。这项工作的贡献是说明如何对软件架构进行注释,嵌入支持组合验证方法的架构的验证信息。为了使SPL的验证成功,一个资产的验证属性必须与SPL家族中其他资产的验证属性无缝集成。本文介绍了一种利用体系结构分析与描述语言(AADL)的附件——AGREE和Resolute两种语言来验证AADL模型所描述的系统的各种特性的方法。我们的技术允许定义约束,这些约束可以在产品实例化时被证明是满足的,但是,语言是不够的。我们的工作显示了工作用例和架构验证的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信