Understanding the Effects of Lecturer Intervention on Computer Science Student Behaviour

Claudia Szabo, Nickolas J. G. Falkner, Antti Knutas, Mohsen Dorodchi
{"title":"Understanding the Effects of Lecturer Intervention on Computer Science Student Behaviour","authors":"Claudia Szabo, Nickolas J. G. Falkner, Antti Knutas, Mohsen Dorodchi","doi":"10.1145/3174781.3174787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Providing effective support and feedback to students is critical to ensure engagement and retention within Computer Science courses. Individual student learning experiences and challenges vary from student to student, and effective intervention is further hampered in a large scale context. In addition, there are a plethora of possible interventions for any given learning challenge, and it is difficult for an educator to establish which intervention is the most effective or quickest to implement. To this, we report on the outcomes of a systematic literature review focused on interventions in Computer Science classrooms. To provide an understanding of the types of interventions possible in a Computer Science course, we propose a taxonomy of intervention types with low mutual information and classify the 129 selected papers based on it. We identify the most effective interventions as presented in their respective studies and discuss gaps in the study of several intervention types. We then present an overview of two of the most popular types of interventions in the published literature: those focused on introducing technical cooperations within courses, and those focused on changing the way the course content is presented to students. To understand how interventions have evolved over time, we present the evolution of sub-classes of interventions over the years.","PeriodicalId":254043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2017 ITiCSE Conference on Working Group Reports","volume":"122 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2017 ITiCSE Conference on Working Group Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3174781.3174787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Providing effective support and feedback to students is critical to ensure engagement and retention within Computer Science courses. Individual student learning experiences and challenges vary from student to student, and effective intervention is further hampered in a large scale context. In addition, there are a plethora of possible interventions for any given learning challenge, and it is difficult for an educator to establish which intervention is the most effective or quickest to implement. To this, we report on the outcomes of a systematic literature review focused on interventions in Computer Science classrooms. To provide an understanding of the types of interventions possible in a Computer Science course, we propose a taxonomy of intervention types with low mutual information and classify the 129 selected papers based on it. We identify the most effective interventions as presented in their respective studies and discuss gaps in the study of several intervention types. We then present an overview of two of the most popular types of interventions in the published literature: those focused on introducing technical cooperations within courses, and those focused on changing the way the course content is presented to students. To understand how interventions have evolved over time, we present the evolution of sub-classes of interventions over the years.
理解讲师干预对计算机科学学生行为的影响
为学生提供有效的支持和反馈是确保参与和保留计算机科学课程的关键。学生的个人学习经历和挑战因学生而异,在大范围的背景下,有效的干预进一步受到阻碍。此外,对于任何给定的学习挑战,都有太多可能的干预措施,教育者很难确定哪种干预措施最有效或实施最快。为此,我们报告了一项关于计算机科学课堂干预的系统文献综述的结果。为了提供对计算机科学课程中可能的干预类型的理解,我们提出了具有低互信息的干预类型的分类法,并根据它对129篇选定的论文进行了分类。我们在各自的研究中确定了最有效的干预措施,并讨论了几种干预措施研究中的差距。然后,我们概述了已发表文献中最流行的两种干预措施:一种侧重于在课程中引入技术合作,另一种侧重于改变课程内容呈现给学生的方式。为了了解干预措施是如何随着时间的推移而演变的,我们展示了多年来干预措施子类的演变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信