Managing Extubation and the Post Extubation Period in the Intensive Care Unit

S. Glover, A. Glossop
{"title":"Managing Extubation and the Post Extubation Period in the Intensive Care Unit","authors":"S. Glover, A. Glossop","doi":"10.33590/emjrespir/10313378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The process of successfully weaning patients from invasive mechanical ventilation is a great challenge for all healthcare providers working in critical care. Despite several recent advances in the care of intensive care patients, failed extubation remains a significant problem that may result in poor patient outcomes. A lack of consensus in many areas regarding clinical approach to extubation and the peri-extubation period exists, and the numerous strategies described in this review add to the complexity of the decision faced by the clinicians involved.\n\nThe process of weaning and timing of extubation may be improved by implementation of a consistent multidisciplinary approach to weaning, with a number of easily identifiable risk factors available to support clinical decision making. There are also many known risk factors that can be used to predict the likelihood of extubation failure; whilst these factors may not be easily modifiable, they do allow the identification of patients at a high risk of extubation failure who may require more detailed care and planning post extubation. Finally, a number of strategies, including non-invasive ventilation and high flow nasal oxygen therapy, are available to support carefully selected groups in the post extubation period. Evidence is emerging linking these adjuncts to a reduction in the risk of extubation failure. This article will discuss these risk factors and the evidence supporting their use in this challenging patient group.","PeriodicalId":300382,"journal":{"name":"EMJ Respiratory","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EMJ Respiratory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33590/emjrespir/10313378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The process of successfully weaning patients from invasive mechanical ventilation is a great challenge for all healthcare providers working in critical care. Despite several recent advances in the care of intensive care patients, failed extubation remains a significant problem that may result in poor patient outcomes. A lack of consensus in many areas regarding clinical approach to extubation and the peri-extubation period exists, and the numerous strategies described in this review add to the complexity of the decision faced by the clinicians involved. The process of weaning and timing of extubation may be improved by implementation of a consistent multidisciplinary approach to weaning, with a number of easily identifiable risk factors available to support clinical decision making. There are also many known risk factors that can be used to predict the likelihood of extubation failure; whilst these factors may not be easily modifiable, they do allow the identification of patients at a high risk of extubation failure who may require more detailed care and planning post extubation. Finally, a number of strategies, including non-invasive ventilation and high flow nasal oxygen therapy, are available to support carefully selected groups in the post extubation period. Evidence is emerging linking these adjuncts to a reduction in the risk of extubation failure. This article will discuss these risk factors and the evidence supporting their use in this challenging patient group.
管理拔管和拔管后期间在重症监护病房
成功地使患者脱离有创机械通气的过程对所有从事重症监护的医疗保健提供者来说都是一个巨大的挑战。尽管最近在重症监护患者的护理方面取得了一些进展,但拔管失败仍然是一个可能导致患者预后不良的重大问题。关于拔管和拔管期的临床方法,在许多领域缺乏共识,本综述中描述的众多策略增加了临床医生所面临的决策的复杂性。通过实施一致的多学科方法进行脱机,可以改善脱机过程和拔管时间,并提供一些易于识别的风险因素,以支持临床决策。还有许多已知的危险因素可用于预测拔管失败的可能性;虽然这些因素可能不容易改变,但它们确实允许识别拔管失败的高风险患者,这些患者可能需要更详细的护理和拔管后规划。最后,一些策略,包括无创通气和高流量鼻氧治疗,可用于支持精心挑选的组在拔管后时期。越来越多的证据表明,这些辅助装置可以降低拔管失败的风险。本文将讨论这些风险因素以及支持在这一具有挑战性的患者群体中使用它们的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信