Performance Evaluation of Infrared Thermal Sensors based on Distance, Room Temperature, and Physical Activity on Objects

Alif M. Hafizh, T. Abuzairi, Ahli Irfan
{"title":"Performance Evaluation of Infrared Thermal Sensors based on Distance, Room Temperature, and Physical Activity on Objects","authors":"Alif M. Hafizh, T. Abuzairi, Ahli Irfan","doi":"10.1109/QIR54354.2021.9716181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fever has a sensitivity of 54% and specificity of 67% against SARS-CoV-2 so it can be used to determine whether a person is infected with COVID-19. To prevent the spread of the virus in public places, a body temperature screening process using an infrared thermometer is required. The two sensors that are commonly used as infrared thermometers are the MLX90614 and AMG8833 because of their high temperature range and good accuracy. However, the measurement results can be affected by the measuring distance, room temperature, and physical activity in the human body. Therefore, an infrared thermometer with two sensors arranged in overlay was designed to evaluate the performance of infrared thermal sensors based on measuring distances (15, 30, 40, and 60 cm), 2 rooms (26.4 °C and 30 °C), and physical activity on the object. The results in the 30 °C room at 15 – 40 cm show measured temperature above 36 °C for both sensors, while in the 26.4 °C room it decreased up to 35.32 °C. At 15 cm in a 26.4 °C room, the measured temperature results are the closest to the reference values with a difference of less than 0.3 °C for the MLX90614 sensor, while at 60 cm, the results are the furthest from the reference values also it has larger difference value, which is 0.21 °C for the MLX90614 and 1.01 °C for the AMG8833. In conclusion, the MLX90614 sensor is better than the AMG8833 sensor because its outputs are closer to the reference values.","PeriodicalId":446396,"journal":{"name":"2021 17th International Conference on Quality in Research (QIR): International Symposium on Electrical and Computer Engineering","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 17th International Conference on Quality in Research (QIR): International Symposium on Electrical and Computer Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/QIR54354.2021.9716181","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fever has a sensitivity of 54% and specificity of 67% against SARS-CoV-2 so it can be used to determine whether a person is infected with COVID-19. To prevent the spread of the virus in public places, a body temperature screening process using an infrared thermometer is required. The two sensors that are commonly used as infrared thermometers are the MLX90614 and AMG8833 because of their high temperature range and good accuracy. However, the measurement results can be affected by the measuring distance, room temperature, and physical activity in the human body. Therefore, an infrared thermometer with two sensors arranged in overlay was designed to evaluate the performance of infrared thermal sensors based on measuring distances (15, 30, 40, and 60 cm), 2 rooms (26.4 °C and 30 °C), and physical activity on the object. The results in the 30 °C room at 15 – 40 cm show measured temperature above 36 °C for both sensors, while in the 26.4 °C room it decreased up to 35.32 °C. At 15 cm in a 26.4 °C room, the measured temperature results are the closest to the reference values with a difference of less than 0.3 °C for the MLX90614 sensor, while at 60 cm, the results are the furthest from the reference values also it has larger difference value, which is 0.21 °C for the MLX90614 and 1.01 °C for the AMG8833. In conclusion, the MLX90614 sensor is better than the AMG8833 sensor because its outputs are closer to the reference values.
基于距离、室温和物体物理活动的红外热传感器性能评价
发烧对SARS-CoV-2的敏感性为54%,特异性为67%,因此可以用来确定一个人是否感染了COVID-19。为了防止病毒在公共场所传播,需要使用红外体温计进行体温检测。常用的两种传感器是MLX90614和AMG8833,因为它们的温度范围大,精度好。但是,测量结果会受到测量距离、室温、人体活动等因素的影响。因此,我们设计了一种两传感器叠放的红外测温仪,通过测量距离(15、30、40和60 cm)、两个房间(26.4°C和30°C)以及物体上的身体活动来评估红外热传感器的性能。在15 - 40厘米的30°C房间中,结果显示两个传感器的测量温度都高于36°C,而在26.4°C房间中,温度下降到35.32°C。在26.4℃的室温下,MLX90614传感器在15 cm处测得的温度结果与参考值最接近,差值小于0.3℃,而在60 cm处测得的温度结果与参考值距离最远,且差值较大,MLX90614和AMG8833的差值分别为0.21℃和1.01℃。综上所述,MLX90614传感器比AMG8833传感器更好,因为它的输出更接近参考值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信