EXPLORING MECHANISMS FOR ASSURING THE QUALITY OF OPEN AND DISTANCE LEARNING IN PUBLIC HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION IN NAMIBIA

N. Kadhila
{"title":"EXPLORING MECHANISMS FOR ASSURING THE QUALITY OF OPEN AND DISTANCE LEARNING IN PUBLIC HIGHER EDUCATION INSTITUTION IN NAMIBIA","authors":"N. Kadhila","doi":"10.54421/njrst.v2i1.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using the social realism theory of Margret Archer as an analytical tool, this article presents the findings of a research study which was conducted to explore mechanisms for assuring the quality of open and distance learning (ODL) that are implemented in higher education (HE) in Namibia. The study employed a case study research design, taking a pragmatic paradigm whereby three programmes offered through ODL modes of delivery were selected from each of the participating institutions and investigated in terms of the various mechanisms used to assure their quality. Three methods of data collection were used, namely interviews with academics and administrators involved in ODL, document analysis and a questionnaire administered to ODL students. Data were analysed and interpreted using qualitative and quantitative methods. The study found that both higher education institutions (HEIs) and National Quality Assurance Agencies (NQAAs) have in place overarching policies and procedures for quality assurance (QA). However, the QA mechanisms adopted by HEIs and NQAAs comprised a single set of ‘one-size-fits-all’ criteria covering all types of modes of delivery. It was, therefore, found that the ODL criteria were not sufficiently and explicitly covered and that the systems were biased towards the conventional, face-to-face modes of delivery. Based on these findings, the study recommended that both HEIs and NQAAs should have in place clearly and explicitly defined QA criteria and procedures for ODL in order to adequately address the unique quality challenges faced by ODL","PeriodicalId":314128,"journal":{"name":"Namibian Journal for Research, Science and Technology","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Namibian Journal for Research, Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54421/njrst.v2i1.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Using the social realism theory of Margret Archer as an analytical tool, this article presents the findings of a research study which was conducted to explore mechanisms for assuring the quality of open and distance learning (ODL) that are implemented in higher education (HE) in Namibia. The study employed a case study research design, taking a pragmatic paradigm whereby three programmes offered through ODL modes of delivery were selected from each of the participating institutions and investigated in terms of the various mechanisms used to assure their quality. Three methods of data collection were used, namely interviews with academics and administrators involved in ODL, document analysis and a questionnaire administered to ODL students. Data were analysed and interpreted using qualitative and quantitative methods. The study found that both higher education institutions (HEIs) and National Quality Assurance Agencies (NQAAs) have in place overarching policies and procedures for quality assurance (QA). However, the QA mechanisms adopted by HEIs and NQAAs comprised a single set of ‘one-size-fits-all’ criteria covering all types of modes of delivery. It was, therefore, found that the ODL criteria were not sufficiently and explicitly covered and that the systems were biased towards the conventional, face-to-face modes of delivery. Based on these findings, the study recommended that both HEIs and NQAAs should have in place clearly and explicitly defined QA criteria and procedures for ODL in order to adequately address the unique quality challenges faced by ODL
探索确保纳米比亚公立高等教育机构开放和远程教育质量的机制
本文利用玛格丽特·阿彻的社会现实主义理论作为分析工具,介绍了一项研究的结果,该研究旨在探索确保纳米比亚高等教育(HE)中实施的开放和远程学习(ODL)质量的机制。这项研究采用个案研究的研究设计,采用务实的范例,从每个参与机构中选择三个通过发展中国家图书馆的交付方式提供的方案,并根据用于确保其质量的各种机制进行调查。数据收集采用了三种方法,即对参与ODL的学者和管理人员进行访谈,文献分析和对ODL学生进行问卷调查。采用定性和定量方法对数据进行分析和解释。研究发现,高等教育机构(HEIs)和国家质量保证机构(NQAAs)都制定了质量保证(QA)的总体政策和程序。然而,高等教育院校和核院校所采用的质素保证机制,只有一套“一刀切”的准则,涵盖所有类型的教学模式。因此,调查发现,没有充分和明确地涵盖开放的学习标准,而且这些系统倾向于传统的面对面交付方式。基于这些发现,该研究建议高等教育院校和国家质量保证机构都应明确和明确地定义ODL的质量保证标准和程序,以充分解决ODL面临的独特质量挑战
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信