Multi-criteria decision making for evaluating healthcare policies: the benefit/cost analysis by the analytic hierarchy process

G. Marcarelli
{"title":"Multi-criteria decision making for evaluating healthcare policies: the benefit/cost analysis by the analytic hierarchy process","authors":"G. Marcarelli","doi":"10.1504/IJMEI.2016.075754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyses the policies evaluation process in healthcare context. The rationalisation of available resources for health expenses requires that the health policies are, at all levels, aware of the clinical, economic and organisational implications concerning the adoption of healthcare programs (i.e., medical devices, drug therapies, procedures and services within the health facilities). This kind of evaluation implies an interdisciplinary approach because it involves many fields and includes critical assessment and measurement of the actual improvement of the quality of life of patients. The analytic hierarchy process, one of the most useful multi-criteria decision method, may allow the clinical and hospital management to facilitate decisions by structuring a hierarchy of decision elements and weighting criteria involved in the decision problem. In order to select the best preventive policy to reduce the incidence of a given disease, this paper proposes the use of the analytic hierarchy process which considers two hierarchies allowing to analyse both the effectiveness and efficiency of some policies and their costs. The whole works by the point of view of the hospital management.","PeriodicalId":193362,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Medical Eng. Informatics","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Medical Eng. Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMEI.2016.075754","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This paper analyses the policies evaluation process in healthcare context. The rationalisation of available resources for health expenses requires that the health policies are, at all levels, aware of the clinical, economic and organisational implications concerning the adoption of healthcare programs (i.e., medical devices, drug therapies, procedures and services within the health facilities). This kind of evaluation implies an interdisciplinary approach because it involves many fields and includes critical assessment and measurement of the actual improvement of the quality of life of patients. The analytic hierarchy process, one of the most useful multi-criteria decision method, may allow the clinical and hospital management to facilitate decisions by structuring a hierarchy of decision elements and weighting criteria involved in the decision problem. In order to select the best preventive policy to reduce the incidence of a given disease, this paper proposes the use of the analytic hierarchy process which considers two hierarchies allowing to analyse both the effectiveness and efficiency of some policies and their costs. The whole works by the point of view of the hospital management.
评价医疗保健政策的多标准决策:基于层次分析法的效益/成本分析
本文分析了医疗保健环境下的政策评估过程。为使现有的保健费用资源合理化,各级保健政策必须认识到采用保健方案(即医疗设备、药物治疗、保健设施内的程序和服务)所涉及的临床、经济和组织问题。这种评估意味着一种跨学科的方法,因为它涉及许多领域,包括对患者生活质量实际改善的关键评估和测量。层次分析法是一种最有用的多准则决策方法,它可以通过构建决策要素的层次结构和决策问题中涉及的加权标准,从而使临床和医院管理人员更容易做出决策。为了选择最佳的预防政策以减少给定疾病的发病率,本文提出使用层次分析法,该分析法考虑了两个层次,允许分析一些政策的有效性和效率及其成本。全文从医院管理的角度进行论述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信