Analysis of Key Sweetspot Identification Methods and Their Significance for Hydrocarbon Well Placement

Menhal A. Al-Ismael, A. Al-Baiz
{"title":"Analysis of Key Sweetspot Identification Methods and Their Significance for Hydrocarbon Well Placement","authors":"Menhal A. Al-Ismael, A. Al-Baiz","doi":"10.2118/213976-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Sweetspot identification methods are of significant value in optimizing well placement in reservoir simulation studies. These methods vary in their approaches due to the wide-ranging reservoir characteristics and different study objectives. This work analyzes a number of sweetspot identification methods and discusses their advantages and limitations. In addition, we establish a workflow that utilizes a combination of a number of reliable methods. A simulation model of a synthetic heterogeneous reservoir with six million grid-cells is used in this work to evaluate six sweetspot identification methods for the purpose of well placement. The evaluated methods use grid-cell productivity, fluxes and sweep ratio as well as a combination of a number of rock and fluid properties to generate sweetspot 3D maps. Using sweetspot maps from the analyzed methods and the proposed workflow, different well placement scenarios are developed and compared. Results are compared using total hydrocarbon production and voidage replacement ratio. We observe that wells placed using grid-cell productivity maps achieve significant improvement in the total hydrocarbon production over a period of ten years when compared to the other analyzed methods. This method identifies the high productive grid-cells which results in the best performance of wells among the analyzed methods. However, this method provided less emphasis on the grid-cells proximity and connectivity in the sweetspot map. In heterogeneous reservoirs, this can result in tortuous trajectory paths, which are impractical to drill. The flux-based method yielded less hydrocarbon production, but higher voidage replacement ratio. The proposed workflow demonstrated considerable improvements in the total oil production and a balance in voidage replacement ratio. The new workflow retained the advantages of different methods maintaining a balance between their strengths and marking distinct methodology that can be used for well placement optimization. This work highlights potential opportunities to improve the sweep efficiency in heterogeneous reservoirs by developing a hybrid workflow that integrates existing tools and methodologies.","PeriodicalId":286390,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, March 13, 2023","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, March 13, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/213976-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sweetspot identification methods are of significant value in optimizing well placement in reservoir simulation studies. These methods vary in their approaches due to the wide-ranging reservoir characteristics and different study objectives. This work analyzes a number of sweetspot identification methods and discusses their advantages and limitations. In addition, we establish a workflow that utilizes a combination of a number of reliable methods. A simulation model of a synthetic heterogeneous reservoir with six million grid-cells is used in this work to evaluate six sweetspot identification methods for the purpose of well placement. The evaluated methods use grid-cell productivity, fluxes and sweep ratio as well as a combination of a number of rock and fluid properties to generate sweetspot 3D maps. Using sweetspot maps from the analyzed methods and the proposed workflow, different well placement scenarios are developed and compared. Results are compared using total hydrocarbon production and voidage replacement ratio. We observe that wells placed using grid-cell productivity maps achieve significant improvement in the total hydrocarbon production over a period of ten years when compared to the other analyzed methods. This method identifies the high productive grid-cells which results in the best performance of wells among the analyzed methods. However, this method provided less emphasis on the grid-cells proximity and connectivity in the sweetspot map. In heterogeneous reservoirs, this can result in tortuous trajectory paths, which are impractical to drill. The flux-based method yielded less hydrocarbon production, but higher voidage replacement ratio. The proposed workflow demonstrated considerable improvements in the total oil production and a balance in voidage replacement ratio. The new workflow retained the advantages of different methods maintaining a balance between their strengths and marking distinct methodology that can be used for well placement optimization. This work highlights potential opportunities to improve the sweep efficiency in heterogeneous reservoirs by developing a hybrid workflow that integrates existing tools and methodologies.
关键甜点识别方法分析及其在油气配井中的意义
在油藏模拟研究中,甜点识别方法对优化井位具有重要价值。由于储层特征和研究目标的不同,这些方法的方法也各不相同。本文分析了一些甜蜜点识别方法,并讨论了它们的优点和局限性。此外,我们建立了一个工作流,该工作流利用了许多可靠方法的组合。本文采用一个具有600万个网格单元的合成非均质油藏模拟模型,对六种甜点识别方法进行了评价。经过评估的方法使用网格单元生产率、通量和扫描比以及多种岩石和流体性质的组合来生成甜点3D图。利用分析方法的甜点图和提出的工作流程,开发并比较了不同的井位方案。用总油气产量和空隙替代率对结果进行了比较。我们观察到,与其他分析方法相比,使用网格细胞产能图布置的井在10年内的总油气产量显著提高。该方法在所分析的方法中识别出高产网格单元,使井的性能达到最佳。然而,该方法对甜蜜点图中网格单元的接近性和连通性的重视程度较低。在非均质油藏中,这可能导致井眼轨迹曲折,不利于钻井。以通量为基础的方法产油量较少,但气相替代率较高。所提出的工作流程在总产油量和空隙置换率方面都有显著改善。新的工作流程保留了不同方法的优点,保持了各自优势之间的平衡,并标记了可用于优化井位的独特方法。这项工作强调了通过开发集成现有工具和方法的混合工作流程来提高非均质油藏波及效率的潜在机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信