Affordability studies using probability of failure for complex aerospace systems

B.L. Krabbe, H. Rolén
{"title":"Affordability studies using probability of failure for complex aerospace systems","authors":"B.L. Krabbe, H. Rolén","doi":"10.1109/RAMS.1996.500674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ability to apply extensive R&M analysis while a design is still plastic, has the potential to provide dramatic cost savings during new product development. Modem R&M analysis tools that are fully integrated with the other engineering analysis tools, can provide this capability. Since no new aerospace development is truly entirely new, with as much as 85% of its components having been used in other products, the process of moving R&M analysis to an earlier portion of the concept development effort is a matter of integrating extensive component libraries with existing analysis algorithms. When these ingredients are combined with a modern graphical users interface (GUI), it becomes possible to quickly characterize large complex aerospace systems with sufficient detail to identify the significant R&M drivers. Cost savings are also realized in the increased productivity of the individual analyst. Tools like the Automated Concurrent Engineering Synthesis- Advanced Reliability Modeling (ACES-ARM) are having the effect of more affordable designs. Other cost advantages in using ACES-ARM are the reduction of resources (personnel and time) to perform R&M analysis, and a significant reduction in the amount of training required to run the ACES models. Improved inter-engineering discipline communication also reduces the time and effort required to conceive and simulate a new aerospace product. The time from drawing board to ramp is therefore reduced. The paper describes the use of ACES-ARM.","PeriodicalId":393833,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 1996 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 1996 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS.1996.500674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ability to apply extensive R&M analysis while a design is still plastic, has the potential to provide dramatic cost savings during new product development. Modem R&M analysis tools that are fully integrated with the other engineering analysis tools, can provide this capability. Since no new aerospace development is truly entirely new, with as much as 85% of its components having been used in other products, the process of moving R&M analysis to an earlier portion of the concept development effort is a matter of integrating extensive component libraries with existing analysis algorithms. When these ingredients are combined with a modern graphical users interface (GUI), it becomes possible to quickly characterize large complex aerospace systems with sufficient detail to identify the significant R&M drivers. Cost savings are also realized in the increased productivity of the individual analyst. Tools like the Automated Concurrent Engineering Synthesis- Advanced Reliability Modeling (ACES-ARM) are having the effect of more affordable designs. Other cost advantages in using ACES-ARM are the reduction of resources (personnel and time) to perform R&M analysis, and a significant reduction in the amount of training required to run the ACES models. Improved inter-engineering discipline communication also reduces the time and effort required to conceive and simulate a new aerospace product. The time from drawing board to ramp is therefore reduced. The paper describes the use of ACES-ARM.
使用失效概率对复杂航空航天系统进行可承受性研究
在设计仍然是可塑的情况下应用广泛的R&M分析的能力,有可能在新产品开发期间提供显着的成本节约。与其他工程分析工具完全集成的现代R&M分析工具可以提供这种能力。由于没有新的航空航天开发是真正全新的,其85%的组件已经在其他产品中使用过,因此将R&M分析转移到概念开发工作的早期部分的过程是将大量组件库与现有分析算法集成在一起的问题。当这些成分与现代图形用户界面(GUI)结合在一起时,就有可能快速描述大型复杂航空航天系统,并提供足够的细节来识别重要的R&M驱动因素。成本节约还体现在个体分析人员生产力的提高上。像自动化并行工程综合-高级可靠性建模(ACES-ARM)这样的工具正在产生更经济实惠的设计效果。使用ACES- arm的其他成本优势是减少了执行R&M分析的资源(人员和时间),并且显著减少了运行ACES模型所需的培训量。改进的工程学科间沟通也减少了构思和模拟新航空航天产品所需的时间和精力。因此减少了从画板到坡道的时间。本文介绍了ace - arm的使用方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信