The game of rankings in a quality world university space

G. Stamelos, P. Evangelakou
{"title":"The game of rankings in a quality world university space","authors":"G. Stamelos, P. Evangelakou","doi":"10.7203/CREATIVITY.2.13802","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this text is to proceed to an analysis of international classifications and their impact on two levels: a) their unexpected public success, and b) their decisive influence on higher education policy and strategy. We argue that defining quality assurance is crucial in order to legitimize choices about evaluation on a political and institutional level. In any case, it seems clear that rankings are a dubious construction but highly legitimized by the public and governments. So, under these circumstances, rankings are here and they will probably stay, together with the financial issues they create. Indeed, rankings are an interesting new global market product which universities seem to have to negotiate wisely.","PeriodicalId":162178,"journal":{"name":"Creativity and Educational Innovation Review","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Creativity and Educational Innovation Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7203/CREATIVITY.2.13802","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The objective of this text is to proceed to an analysis of international classifications and their impact on two levels: a) their unexpected public success, and b) their decisive influence on higher education policy and strategy. We argue that defining quality assurance is crucial in order to legitimize choices about evaluation on a political and institutional level. In any case, it seems clear that rankings are a dubious construction but highly legitimized by the public and governments. So, under these circumstances, rankings are here and they will probably stay, together with the financial issues they create. Indeed, rankings are an interesting new global market product which universities seem to have to negotiate wisely.
排名游戏在一个优质的世界大学空间
本文的目的是对国际分类及其在两个层面上的影响进行分析:a)他们意想不到的公共成功,b)他们对高等教育政策和战略的决定性影响。我们认为,定义质量保证是至关重要的,以便在政治和制度层面上使有关评估的选择合法化。无论如何,似乎很明显,排名是一个可疑的结构,但公众和政府高度合法化。所以,在这种情况下,排名就在这里,它们可能会继续存在,连同它们产生的财务问题。的确,排名是一个有趣的全球市场新产品,大学似乎必须明智地进行谈判。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信