Deciphering the Two-Sided Market Model of Rochet and Tirole: An Intricate Undertaking

Adriaan ten Kate
{"title":"Deciphering the Two-Sided Market Model of Rochet and Tirole: An Intricate Undertaking","authors":"Adriaan ten Kate","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3894541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the most frequently cited articles in the economics literature of this millennium is that on platform competition in two-sided markets by Rochet and Tirole (2003). Yet it is probably also among the least understood. I have several reasons to think so. One is that the two-sided market model of the article is introduced using a highly confusing language and leaving many underlying assumptions unstated. Another is that the text is littered with mathematical formulae with scant explanation of why they are there, and even with mistakes in them. But the most important reason is that the model does not fit the story told around it, and pretends to have a much broader scope than it actually has. In this paper, I spell out the key assumptions and rephrase the model in a more transparent way, so as to unveil what it really stands for. Be prepared for some disappointment!","PeriodicalId":321987,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Pricing (Topic)","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Pricing (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3894541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

One of the most frequently cited articles in the economics literature of this millennium is that on platform competition in two-sided markets by Rochet and Tirole (2003). Yet it is probably also among the least understood. I have several reasons to think so. One is that the two-sided market model of the article is introduced using a highly confusing language and leaving many underlying assumptions unstated. Another is that the text is littered with mathematical formulae with scant explanation of why they are there, and even with mistakes in them. But the most important reason is that the model does not fit the story told around it, and pretends to have a much broader scope than it actually has. In this paper, I spell out the key assumptions and rephrase the model in a more transparent way, so as to unveil what it really stands for. Be prepared for some disappointment!
解读罗切特和梯若尔的双边市场模型:一项复杂的工作
本千年经济学文献中最常被引用的文章之一是Rochet和Tirole(2003)关于双边市场中的平台竞争的文章。然而,它可能也是最不为人所知的。我有几个理由这样认为。一个是,文章中的双边市场模型使用了一种非常令人困惑的语言,并且没有说明许多潜在的假设。另一个原因是,教材中充斥着数学公式,却很少解释为什么会出现这些公式,甚至还有错误。但最重要的原因是,该模型并不符合围绕它的故事,并假装拥有比实际更广泛的范围。在本文中,我阐明了关键假设,并以更透明的方式重新表述了模型,从而揭示了它真正代表的含义。做好失望的准备吧!
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信