A survey of veterinary professionals about their interactions with free-living native animals and the volunteer wildlife rehabilitation sector in New South Wales, Australia

R. Haering, Vanessa K. Wilson, Annie Zhuo, P. Stathis
{"title":"A survey of veterinary professionals about their interactions with free-living native animals and the volunteer wildlife rehabilitation sector in New South Wales, Australia","authors":"R. Haering, Vanessa K. Wilson, Annie Zhuo, P. Stathis","doi":"10.7882/az.2020.045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The views of veterinary professionals were surveyed to inform the New South Wales Government about the extent, cost and nature of services they provide to free-living native animals and their interactions with the volunteer wildlife rehabilitation sector. Our aim was to better understand the challenges faced by veterinarians and veterinary nurses and the veterinary practices they work from. The survey was part of an extensive review of the New South Wales wildlife rehabilitation sector to inform strategic improvements to volunteer standards and service delivery. We found New South Wales private veterinary practices and their staff provide an essential network of support for the rehabilitation of sick and injured free-living native animals. Nearly all responding private veterinary practices provided some type of service pro-bono. The annual value of free services and products was estimated to be $1,038,650. Reported average weekly animal caseload was about five with birds the most frequent patients. Cost of services was the main challenge faced by practices, followed by knowledge and skill of staff. Veterinarians and veterinary nurses considered their formal training to not be very useful in teaching skills relevant to free-living native animals and sought further professional development opportunities in animal assessment, treatment and rehabilitation techniques. Most respondents were satisfied with the standard of care afforded to native animals by volunteers. Complaints focused on delays in native animal pick-ups and communication with practice staff. We make recommendations for improving veterinary capacity and strengthening relationships with the volunteer wildlife rehabilitation sector.","PeriodicalId":430003,"journal":{"name":"The Australian zoologist","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Australian zoologist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7882/az.2020.045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The views of veterinary professionals were surveyed to inform the New South Wales Government about the extent, cost and nature of services they provide to free-living native animals and their interactions with the volunteer wildlife rehabilitation sector. Our aim was to better understand the challenges faced by veterinarians and veterinary nurses and the veterinary practices they work from. The survey was part of an extensive review of the New South Wales wildlife rehabilitation sector to inform strategic improvements to volunteer standards and service delivery. We found New South Wales private veterinary practices and their staff provide an essential network of support for the rehabilitation of sick and injured free-living native animals. Nearly all responding private veterinary practices provided some type of service pro-bono. The annual value of free services and products was estimated to be $1,038,650. Reported average weekly animal caseload was about five with birds the most frequent patients. Cost of services was the main challenge faced by practices, followed by knowledge and skill of staff. Veterinarians and veterinary nurses considered their formal training to not be very useful in teaching skills relevant to free-living native animals and sought further professional development opportunities in animal assessment, treatment and rehabilitation techniques. Most respondents were satisfied with the standard of care afforded to native animals by volunteers. Complaints focused on delays in native animal pick-ups and communication with practice staff. We make recommendations for improving veterinary capacity and strengthening relationships with the volunteer wildlife rehabilitation sector.
一项关于兽医专业人员与自由生活的本地动物和澳大利亚新南威尔士州志愿野生动物康复部门互动的调查
对兽医专业人员的意见进行了调查,以便向新南威尔士州政府通报他们为自由生活的本地动物提供服务的程度、成本和性质,以及他们与志愿野生动物康复部门的互动。我们的目的是更好地了解兽医和兽医护士以及他们所从事的兽医实践所面临的挑战。这项调查是对新南威尔士州野生动物康复部门进行广泛审查的一部分,目的是为志愿者标准和服务提供的战略改进提供信息。我们发现新南威尔士州的私人兽医实践和他们的工作人员为生病和受伤的自由生活的本地动物的康复提供了重要的支持网络。几乎所有回应的私人兽医诊所都提供了某种形式的无偿服务。每年免费服务和产品的价值估计为1 038 650美元。报告的平均每周动物病例数约为5例,其中鸟类是最常见的患者。服务费用是各做法面临的主要挑战,其次是工作人员的知识和技能。兽医和兽医护士认为,他们接受的正规培训在教授与自由生活的本地动物有关的技能方面用处不大,因此寻求在动物评估、治疗和康复技术方面进一步的专业发展机会。大多数受访者对志愿者对本地动物的照顾标准感到满意。投诉主要集中在本地动物采集的延误和与实习人员的沟通上。我们就提高兽医能力和加强与志愿野生动物康复部门的关系提出建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信