Protreptikos, czyli zachęta do myślenia na XXI wiek

Marek Szulakiewicz
{"title":"Protreptikos, czyli zachęta do myślenia na XXI wiek","authors":"Marek Szulakiewicz","doi":"10.14746/h.2022.2.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In ancient times, protreptics encouraged to something and directed the attention towards a goal. Their aim was often to change behaviour. Using this ancient form, the article is an incentive to restore thinking’s primary function in culture. The key threats, which have appeared in the culture of technology, have been presented. Increasingly, it is believed (also at universities) that a human being only needs information, preparation for the market, and he needs neither the meaning nor understanding of the information, nor the philosophical reflection. Thinking itself – following the example of John Dewey – is only associated with an increase in productivity. However, without concern for thinking and restoring its sapiential dimension, culture is threatened by infantilism and the loss of the meaning of our existence.","PeriodicalId":312956,"journal":{"name":"Humaniora. Czasopismo Internetowe","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Humaniora. Czasopismo Internetowe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/h.2022.2.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In ancient times, protreptics encouraged to something and directed the attention towards a goal. Their aim was often to change behaviour. Using this ancient form, the article is an incentive to restore thinking’s primary function in culture. The key threats, which have appeared in the culture of technology, have been presented. Increasingly, it is believed (also at universities) that a human being only needs information, preparation for the market, and he needs neither the meaning nor understanding of the information, nor the philosophical reflection. Thinking itself – following the example of John Dewey – is only associated with an increase in productivity. However, without concern for thinking and restoring its sapiential dimension, culture is threatened by infantilism and the loss of the meaning of our existence.
在古代,保护者鼓励人们去做某事,并将注意力引向一个目标。他们的目标往往是改变人们的行为。文章用这种古老的形式来激励人们恢复思维在文化中的首要功能。提出了技术文化中出现的主要威胁。越来越多的人(在大学里也是如此)认为,一个人只需要信息,为市场做准备,他既不需要信息的意义,也不需要对信息的理解,也不需要哲学思考。思考本身——以约翰·杜威为例——只与生产力的提高有关。然而,如果不关心思考和恢复其智慧维度,文化就会受到幼稚主义和我们存在意义的丧失的威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信