OTONOMI DESA ADAT: SEBUAH FATAMORGANA? KASUS DARI DESA ADAT INTARAN, BALI, INDONESIA

Mudiyati Rahmatunnisa, Fauzan Ramaditya, Haelvyn Pratagrahana Putra, Anandya Khairunnisa
{"title":"OTONOMI DESA ADAT: SEBUAH FATAMORGANA? KASUS DARI DESA ADAT INTARAN, BALI, INDONESIA","authors":"Mudiyati Rahmatunnisa, Fauzan Ramaditya, Haelvyn Pratagrahana Putra, Anandya Khairunnisa","doi":"10.36859/jap.v6i2.1737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the empirical experience of indigenous village autonomy in Indonesia as normatively regulated in the 1945 Constitution and the recent 2014 Law on Regional Government. The prolonged debate by many on the issue has mainly focused on how autonomous indigenous villages have actually been due to various forms of state intervention (also referred to as \"stateization\"). This study specifically identifies a number of empirical practices of autonomy in the Desa Adat Intaran of Bali Province. The case study provides a fertile ground for a variety of information related to the subject matter amidst the recent developments in the COVID-19 pandemic recovery efforts and the strong resistance of village communities to the LNG Terminal development project on Mertasari Beach by the Central Government and Bali Province in 2022 within the territory of Desa Adat Intaran. This study is particularly important in terms of adding current data and information to the current debate on the practice of indigenous village autonomy in Indonesia. This research utilizes qualitative research methods with a series of interviews, Focus Group Discussions as well as literature studies as data collection techniques. Triangulation techniques were also used to validate the qualitative data. The study argues that there has been noticeable state intervention in the implementation of autonomy of Desa Adat Intaran both in terms of institutions, programs and the allocated village budget. This finding confirms that there is a large gap between normative indigenous village autonomy and actual practice.","PeriodicalId":149056,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Academia Praja","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Academia Praja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36859/jap.v6i2.1737","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the empirical experience of indigenous village autonomy in Indonesia as normatively regulated in the 1945 Constitution and the recent 2014 Law on Regional Government. The prolonged debate by many on the issue has mainly focused on how autonomous indigenous villages have actually been due to various forms of state intervention (also referred to as "stateization"). This study specifically identifies a number of empirical practices of autonomy in the Desa Adat Intaran of Bali Province. The case study provides a fertile ground for a variety of information related to the subject matter amidst the recent developments in the COVID-19 pandemic recovery efforts and the strong resistance of village communities to the LNG Terminal development project on Mertasari Beach by the Central Government and Bali Province in 2022 within the territory of Desa Adat Intaran. This study is particularly important in terms of adding current data and information to the current debate on the practice of indigenous village autonomy in Indonesia. This research utilizes qualitative research methods with a series of interviews, Focus Group Discussions as well as literature studies as data collection techniques. Triangulation techniques were also used to validate the qualitative data. The study argues that there has been noticeable state intervention in the implementation of autonomy of Desa Adat Intaran both in terms of institutions, programs and the allocated village budget. This finding confirms that there is a large gap between normative indigenous village autonomy and actual practice.
乡村自治:海市蜃楼?印度尼西亚巴厘岛的一个部落村庄
本研究考察了1945年《宪法》和最近的2014年《区域政府法》对印度尼西亚土著村庄自治进行规范的经验。许多人在这个问题上的长期辩论主要集中在自治的土著村庄实际上是如何由于各种形式的国家干预(也被称为“国家化”)。本研究特别确定了巴厘省Desa Adat Intaran自治的一些经验实践。在COVID-19大流行恢复工作的最新进展以及村庄社区对中央政府和巴厘岛省于2022年在德萨·阿达特·因塔兰领土内的默塔萨里海滩液化天然气终端开发项目的强烈抵制的背景下,该案例研究为与该主题相关的各种信息提供了肥沃的土壤。这项研究特别重要,因为它为目前关于印度尼西亚土著村庄自治实践的辩论增加了当前的数据和信息。本研究采用定性研究方法,采用访谈法、焦点小组讨论法和文献研究法作为数据收集技术。三角测量技术也被用来验证定性数据。该研究认为,在实施Desa Adat Intaran自治的过程中,无论是在制度、项目还是分配给村庄的预算方面,都存在明显的国家干预。这一发现证实了规范的土著村落自治与实际存在较大的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信