Background

Apisara Sritulanon, apisarasri
{"title":"Background","authors":"Apisara Sritulanon, apisarasri","doi":"10.1002/9781119224075.ch1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims at investigating the effects of morphological instruction, roots and affixes, on the reading abilities in terms of vocabulary and reading comprehension of low proficiency adult EFL learners at a university level in Thailand. The study focuses on whether those students are able to make educated guesses on the meaning of unknown words using their morphological knowledge to help them comprehend better in reading passages. The findings of the study reveal that there was no statistically significant difference between the pre-test and the post-test scores of the control group and the experimental group after morphological instruction on roots and affixes. Similarly, the research found that there was no statistically significant difference in the final exam scores in terms of vocabulary knowledge, reading comprehension and vocabulary-reading sections between the experimental and the control groups. The results could be discussed in two aspects. The first one is that the teaching morphemes (roots and affixes) did not foster the vocabulary development and reading comprehension skills of low-proficient adult EFL learners who have limitation of 2,000 – 3, 000 common words. The second one is that both morphological instruction and extensive reading through reading exercises probably supported the low-proficient learners’ reading abilities.","PeriodicalId":261469,"journal":{"name":"Exploring Malicious Hacker Communities","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploring Malicious Hacker Communities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119224075.ch1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article aims at investigating the effects of morphological instruction, roots and affixes, on the reading abilities in terms of vocabulary and reading comprehension of low proficiency adult EFL learners at a university level in Thailand. The study focuses on whether those students are able to make educated guesses on the meaning of unknown words using their morphological knowledge to help them comprehend better in reading passages. The findings of the study reveal that there was no statistically significant difference between the pre-test and the post-test scores of the control group and the experimental group after morphological instruction on roots and affixes. Similarly, the research found that there was no statistically significant difference in the final exam scores in terms of vocabulary knowledge, reading comprehension and vocabulary-reading sections between the experimental and the control groups. The results could be discussed in two aspects. The first one is that the teaching morphemes (roots and affixes) did not foster the vocabulary development and reading comprehension skills of low-proficient adult EFL learners who have limitation of 2,000 – 3, 000 common words. The second one is that both morphological instruction and extensive reading through reading exercises probably supported the low-proficient learners’ reading abilities.
背景
本文旨在探讨词形教学、词根和词缀对泰国大学低水平成人英语学习者词汇阅读能力和阅读理解能力的影响。该研究的重点是这些学生是否能够利用他们的形态学知识对未知单词的意义进行有根据的猜测,以帮助他们更好地理解阅读段落。研究结果显示,在词根词缀的形态学指导下,对照组和实验组的前测和后测成绩没有统计学差异。同样,研究发现,在期末考试中,实验组和对照组在词汇知识、阅读理解和词汇阅读部分方面的成绩也没有统计学上的差异。结果可以从两个方面进行讨论。一是教学语素(词根和词缀)并没有促进成人英语低熟练程度学习者的词汇发展和阅读理解能力,他们只能掌握2000 - 3000个常用词。第二,形态教学和通过阅读练习进行的泛读都可能支持低水平学习者的阅读能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信