Effect of plaque of five toothpastes used in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity.

Clinical preventive dentistry Pub Date : 1990-10-01
M Addy, P Mostafa, R G Newcombe
{"title":"Effect of plaque of five toothpastes used in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity.","authors":"M Addy,&nbsp;P Mostafa,&nbsp;R G Newcombe","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During a study to assess the efficacy of five toothpastes in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity, the plaque scores of patients were recorded at baseline, 2, 4, and 6 weeks treatment and 6 weeks post-treatment visits. Baseline buccal and lingual plaque indexes were found comparable between the groups and the mean buccal plaque scores were considered low by normal standards. During the use of the three experimental silica-based pastes, one containing strontium acetate, one strontium acetate and MFP and a commercially available formaldehyde-containing paste, plaque scores fell significantly and to a similar extent in all four groups. After cessation of treatment at 6 weeks, plaque scores had increased back to baseline in all groups. During the use of a diatomaceous earth/strontium chloride toothpaste, commercially available, plaque scores increased significantly, both from baseline and by comparison with the other four pastes. Nevertheless, plaque scores in this group returned to baseline levels after cessation of treatment and a return to use of a conventional non-desensitizing toothpaste. The effects of all but the diatomaceous earth/strontium chloride toothpaste would not be inconsistent with previous experience in toothbrushing studies where patients are monitored regularly. The effects on plaque did not necessarily coincide with the previously reported treatment benefit of the respective products in dentin hypersensitivity.</p>","PeriodicalId":75715,"journal":{"name":"Clinical preventive dentistry","volume":"12 4","pages":"28-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical preventive dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During a study to assess the efficacy of five toothpastes in the treatment of dentin hypersensitivity, the plaque scores of patients were recorded at baseline, 2, 4, and 6 weeks treatment and 6 weeks post-treatment visits. Baseline buccal and lingual plaque indexes were found comparable between the groups and the mean buccal plaque scores were considered low by normal standards. During the use of the three experimental silica-based pastes, one containing strontium acetate, one strontium acetate and MFP and a commercially available formaldehyde-containing paste, plaque scores fell significantly and to a similar extent in all four groups. After cessation of treatment at 6 weeks, plaque scores had increased back to baseline in all groups. During the use of a diatomaceous earth/strontium chloride toothpaste, commercially available, plaque scores increased significantly, both from baseline and by comparison with the other four pastes. Nevertheless, plaque scores in this group returned to baseline levels after cessation of treatment and a return to use of a conventional non-desensitizing toothpaste. The effects of all but the diatomaceous earth/strontium chloride toothpaste would not be inconsistent with previous experience in toothbrushing studies where patients are monitored regularly. The effects on plaque did not necessarily coincide with the previously reported treatment benefit of the respective products in dentin hypersensitivity.

五种牙膏治疗牙本质过敏的牙菌斑效果。
在一项评估五种牙膏治疗牙本质过敏疗效的研究中,记录了患者在基线、治疗2周、4周和6周以及治疗后6周就诊时的牙菌斑评分。两组之间的口腔和舌菌斑基线指数具有可比性,按照正常标准,平均口腔菌斑评分较低。在使用三种实验硅基膏剂期间,一种含有醋酸锶,一种含有醋酸锶和MFP,一种是市售的含甲醛膏剂,斑块评分显着下降,并且在所有四组中都有相似的程度。在6周停止治疗后,所有组的斑块评分都恢复到基线水平。在使用市售的硅藻土/氯化锶牙膏期间,与其他四种牙膏相比,斑块评分显著增加。然而,在停止治疗并重新使用传统的非脱敏牙膏后,该组的牙菌斑得分恢复到基线水平。除了硅藻土/氯化锶牙膏外,所有牙膏的效果都与之前定期监测患者的刷牙研究经验不一致。对牙菌斑的影响并不一定与先前报道的各自产品对牙本质过敏的治疗效果一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信