Who Owns the Project Name?

Pamela S. Chestek
{"title":"Who Owns the Project Name?","authors":"Pamela S. Chestek","doi":"10.5033/IFOSSLR.V5I2.87","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the United States, ownership of trade marks can be bedevilling. A trade mark registration is not a grant of rights, only recognition of already-existing rights. Instead, a trade mark is owned by the first to use it and may only be registered by the owner. But, there is no consistent rule or standard that courts apply when deciding disputes over ownership. Moreover, U.S. trade mark law eschews the concept of joint ownership, considering it inconsistent with a trade mark's role as a sole source identifier or assurer of quality. Thus, courts are in the position of having to identify a single owner of a trade mark using poorly defined law. This article will review the various ways that courts have decided who owns a trade mark when there are two claimants. It will also provide guidance to free and open source software projects about how to best manage their project names so that the project has a clear claim of ownership and its project name is fully enforceable as a trade mark.","PeriodicalId":125544,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Intellectual Property (Topic)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Intellectual Property (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5033/IFOSSLR.V5I2.87","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In the United States, ownership of trade marks can be bedevilling. A trade mark registration is not a grant of rights, only recognition of already-existing rights. Instead, a trade mark is owned by the first to use it and may only be registered by the owner. But, there is no consistent rule or standard that courts apply when deciding disputes over ownership. Moreover, U.S. trade mark law eschews the concept of joint ownership, considering it inconsistent with a trade mark's role as a sole source identifier or assurer of quality. Thus, courts are in the position of having to identify a single owner of a trade mark using poorly defined law. This article will review the various ways that courts have decided who owns a trade mark when there are two claimants. It will also provide guidance to free and open source software projects about how to best manage their project names so that the project has a clear claim of ownership and its project name is fully enforceable as a trade mark.
谁拥有项目名称?
在美国,商标的所有权可能令人困惑。商标注册不是权利的授予,只是对已经存在的权利的承认。相反,商标归第一个使用它的人所有,只能由商标所有人注册。但是,法院在裁决所有权纠纷时没有一致的规则或标准。此外,美国商标法回避了共同所有权的概念,认为它与商标作为唯一来源标识符或质量保证的角色不一致。因此,法院不得不使用定义不明确的法律来确定商标的单一所有者。本文将回顾法院在有两个申请人时决定谁拥有商标的各种方式。它还将为自由和开源软件项目提供关于如何最好地管理其项目名称的指导,以便项目有一个明确的所有权声明,其项目名称作为商标是完全可执行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信