THE CULTURAL ADAPTATION, RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE SIMPLE PHYSICAL ACTIVITY QUESTIONNAIRE IN COMMON MENTAL DISORDERS

A. Senel, T. Birinci, D. İpekçioğlu, Haluk Yeşi̇lkaya, E. Kaya Mutlu
{"title":"THE CULTURAL ADAPTATION, RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE SIMPLE PHYSICAL ACTIVITY QUESTIONNAIRE IN COMMON MENTAL DISORDERS","authors":"A. Senel, T. Birinci, D. İpekçioğlu, Haluk Yeşi̇lkaya, E. Kaya Mutlu","doi":"10.21653/tjpr.1028157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Simple Physical Activity Questionnaire (SIMPAQ) in patients with common mental disorders. \nMethods: A total of eighty-one patients (mean age: 40.14 ± 13.05 years) were included in this study. The Turkish version of the SIMPAQ was used to evaluate the physical activity levels and sedentary behaviors of the participants. To be used as descriptive data, DSM-5 Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure-Adult was used to evaluate mental health symptomatology. International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (UFAA-SF) and Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) were used to test validity of the questionnaire. \nResults: The items of Turkish version of the SIMPAQ exhibited excellent intercorrelation coefficient (ICC) values (time spent in bed (0.93 (95% CI: 0.90-0.96)), sedentary time 0.87 (95% CI: 0.80-0.92), walking time 0.98 (95% CI: 0.98-0.99), exercise time 0.99 (95% CI: 0.99-0.99), and incidental activity time 0.95 (95% CI: 0.92-0.97)). However, the BPRS had a significant correlation with only the sedentary time of the SIMPAQ (rho=0.25, p=0.02), indicating convergent validity was poor. \nConclusion: The Turkish version of the SIMPAQ is semantically and linguistically adequate to quickly assess physical activity level and sedentary behavior in patients with common mental disorders.","PeriodicalId":289913,"journal":{"name":"Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi","volume":"53 12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Türk Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21653/tjpr.1028157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Simple Physical Activity Questionnaire (SIMPAQ) in patients with common mental disorders. Methods: A total of eighty-one patients (mean age: 40.14 ± 13.05 years) were included in this study. The Turkish version of the SIMPAQ was used to evaluate the physical activity levels and sedentary behaviors of the participants. To be used as descriptive data, DSM-5 Level 1 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure-Adult was used to evaluate mental health symptomatology. International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (UFAA-SF) and Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) were used to test validity of the questionnaire. Results: The items of Turkish version of the SIMPAQ exhibited excellent intercorrelation coefficient (ICC) values (time spent in bed (0.93 (95% CI: 0.90-0.96)), sedentary time 0.87 (95% CI: 0.80-0.92), walking time 0.98 (95% CI: 0.98-0.99), exercise time 0.99 (95% CI: 0.99-0.99), and incidental activity time 0.95 (95% CI: 0.92-0.97)). However, the BPRS had a significant correlation with only the sedentary time of the SIMPAQ (rho=0.25, p=0.02), indicating convergent validity was poor. Conclusion: The Turkish version of the SIMPAQ is semantically and linguistically adequate to quickly assess physical activity level and sedentary behavior in patients with common mental disorders.
土耳其语版简单体力活动问卷在常见精神障碍中的文化适应性、信度和效度
目的:本研究的目的是评估土耳其版简单身体活动问卷(SIMPAQ)在常见精神障碍患者中的效度和信度。方法:共纳入81例患者,平均年龄40.14±13.05岁。土耳其版SIMPAQ被用来评估参与者的身体活动水平和久坐行为。作为描述性数据,使用DSM-5一级交叉症状测量-成人来评估心理健康症状。采用国际体育活动简易问卷(UFAA-SF)和简易精神病学评定量表(BPRS)对问卷进行效度检验。结果:土耳其版SIMPAQ项目表现出良好的相关系数(ICC)值(卧床时间0.93 (95% CI: 0.90-0.96),久坐时间0.87 (95% CI: 0.80-0.92),步行时间0.98 (95% CI: 0.98-0.99),运动时间0.99 (95% CI: 0.99-0.99),附带活动时间0.95 (95% CI: 0.92-0.97))。然而,BPRS仅与SIMPAQ的久坐时间有显著相关(rho=0.25, p=0.02),表明收敛效度较差。结论:土耳其语版SIMPAQ在语义和语言上足以快速评估常见精神障碍患者的身体活动水平和久坐行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信